Washington Initiatives 591 and 194 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 08:17:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Washington Initiatives 591 and 194 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: How would you vote on these conflicting initiatives?
#1
Yes/No (D)		  
#2
Yes/No (R)		  
#3
Yes/No (I/O)		  
#4
No/Yes (D)		  
#5
No/Yes (R)		  
#6
No/Yes (I/O)		  
#7
No/No (D)		  
#8
No/No (R)		  
#9
No/No (I/O)		  
#10
Yes/Yes (D)		  
#11
Yes/Yes (R)		  
#12
Yes/Yes (I/O)		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 49

Author Topic: Washington Initiatives 591 and 194  (Read 803 times)
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440
« on: October 23, 2014, 12:17:50 PM »
No/No

591 would be tempting if it didn't implement stronger background checks than are currently required by federal law. That said, I'm not an absolutist in opposing background checks (I would support banning ownership of firearms by known members of hate groups) but in the present-day context in which that debate is going on, I'm solidly against more stringent requirements for purchasing a firearm.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2014, 10:32:31 PM »
Quote from: Deus Naturae on October 23, 2014, 02:08:32 PM
Quote from: Senator TNF on October 23, 2014, 12:17:50 PM
No/No

591 would be tempting if it didn't implement stronger background checks than are currently required by federal law.
It doesn't. It bans implementation of stronger background checks.

Oh, the wording in the OP was kind of confusing. In that case then, I would probably vote Yes/No
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 14 queries.