New Jersey Public Question #2 (2014)

[ElectionsGuy]

Description: Dedicates six percent of corporate business tax revenues to open space preservation. Full Details

No

[Goldwater]

No

[H. Ross Peron]

Inclined towards yes

[New_Conservative]

No

[Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck]

I'll be voting "yes" on this one, but it's not terribly important to me as I fail to see how one can reliably predict how this will turn out.  However, my "yes" vote will stem from the fact that I think NJ can be cleaner than the status quo (NJ is no where near as nasty as it's reputation, BTW).

[🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸]

It looks like it's a major change to the funding formula for several environmentally-related programs (some more, some less), so I'd have to see some more information on the reason behind these changes. The conservation and preservation fund is depleted, but are the other environmental programs meanwhile overfunded?
Generally I think having funding formulas in a constitution should be avoided, but that option isn't available here.

[AggregateDemand]

If you tax real estate appropriately in the first place, you won't need to divert funds to preserve open spaces.

[Mr. Illini]

Yes, of course.

[Wake Me Up When The Hard Border Ends]

No.