Battle of the bads 2.0 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 03:12:13 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Battle of the bads 2.0 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who was the worse candidate?
#1
Martha Coakley
 
#2
Alex Sink
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 61

Author Topic: Battle of the bads 2.0  (Read 931 times)
Clarko95 📚💰📈
Clarko95
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,607
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -5.61, S: -1.96

« on: October 27, 2014, 12:32:12 PM »

Coakley is objectively the worst.

Sink lost by only 62,00 votes (1.15 percentage points) statewide in a national Republican wave year in a swing state with a Republican-tint, and by 3,400 votes (1.8 percentage points) in a special election in a lean-Republican house district that previously elected a Republican with 57% of the vote.

Coakley lost by 108,000 votes and 5 percentage points statewide in a special Senate election before the aforementioned Republican wave took hold in a heavily Democratic state, and looks like she's going to blow the gubernatorial race in the same state by a big margin.

Sink puts up a good fight in adverse conditions and barely loses when the ground shifts beneath her, while Coakley throws every winnable race. You pretty much have to vote Coakley as the worst here.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 11 queries.