Battle of the bads 2.0 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 04:13:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Battle of the bads 2.0 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who was the worse candidate?
#1
Martha Coakley
 
#2
Alex Sink
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 61

Author Topic: Battle of the bads 2.0  (Read 907 times)
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« on: October 26, 2014, 04:31:11 PM »

I honestly don't think Sink is a bad candidate. Her 2010 result was pretty strong, and it's not like she got blown out in the House election either (a non presidential year special election would've been tough for any Dem). Now, if Florida had a stronger bench, I'd still not want her to run for anything again. But since it's Florida, she might actually be one of our better candidates...
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2014, 04:45:22 PM »

I honestly don't think Sink is a bad candidate. Her 2010 result was pretty strong, and it's not like she got blown out in the House election either (a non presidential year special election would've been tough for any Dem). Now, if Florida had a stronger bench, I'd still not want her to run for anything again. But since it's Florida, she might actually be one of our better candidates...

You're sugar coating it. Both of Sink's loses were an embarrassment. She shouldn't run again, Democrats should just put a fresh face out there.

How was 2010 an embarrassment? That year, Republicans were winning by double digits in states like Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Nevada. Florida is redder than those three (especially in midterm years), and Sink lost by a point, and even held Scott under 50%.

Her 2014 loss was more of an embarrassment simply because she started with such a huge lead, but that was obviously never going to hold in an R+1 district in a low turnout election.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.