Massachusetts Question 1 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 05:50:01 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Massachusetts Question 1 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would you vote yes or no on this ballot measure?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 60

Author Topic: Massachusetts Question 1  (Read 1229 times)
Citizen Hats
lol-i-wear-hats
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 680
Canada


« on: October 28, 2014, 09:17:04 PM »

NO. 

transitioning away from the carbon economy is best done by hiking the cost of carboniferous fuels.  A gas tax covers a lot of that, not to mention that it helps pay for the roads which are massively subsidized, to the detriment of a lot of public life. 

If you're worried about the distributional effects, do what BC did and send a income-based rebate to low-income households, rather than insist on yet more subsidies for everyone's 1500 pound private vehicle. 
Logged
Citizen Hats
lol-i-wear-hats
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 680
Canada


« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2014, 10:43:40 PM »

But experience simply doesn't bear that out. British Columbia has lowered emissions since 2009 with no observable effects on growth, with the revenues plowed into income tax cuts and low-income rebates.

People adjust their lives, as strange as it may sound. They drive less, they take transit, they decide not to move out to suburbia. It doesn't happen overnight, but people adjust their lives around costs. They demand more transit options from their government. 

Canada didn't achieve high transit ridership in a day
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 13 queries.