Upset of election night
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 02:07:58 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Upset of election night
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Upset of election night  (Read 1751 times)
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,634
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 28, 2014, 08:38:52 PM »

What do you think will be the biggest upsets of election night in Congress? Can be for both House and Senate races.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2014, 08:46:00 PM »

Are we judging whether or not it's an upset by the polls, or just by what you'd expect from the fundamentals? For example, Coakley/Brownback losing wouldn't be surprising to any of us, but it would be for the latter type.
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,634
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2014, 08:53:50 PM »

Are we judging whether or not it's an upset by the polls, or just by what you'd expect from the fundamentals? For example, Coakley/Brownback losing wouldn't be surprising to any of us, but it would be for the latter type.
Former, though the latter would work for underpolled races (although most competitive Senate races has had a lot of polling).
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,540
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2014, 08:57:01 PM »

John Barrow losing his bid for re-election would definitely be up there. 
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,668
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2014, 09:02:14 PM »

All of the following losing would be a big upset:

Braley
M. Udall
Roberts
Hagan
Shaheen

Any of the following coming within single digits of winning would also qualify:

Weh
Oberweis
Bell
Wehby
Tennant
Curtis

Or any of the following coming within five points of winning:

Gillespie
McFadden
Land
Weiland/Pressler
Logged
RR1997
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,997
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2014, 09:07:26 PM »

Weh coming within single digits.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 28, 2014, 09:26:14 PM »

Nunn winning 50.01%
Logged
Barnes
Roy Barnes 2010
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,556


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 28, 2014, 09:28:33 PM »

John Barrow losing his bid for re-election would definitely be up there. 

I certainly agree with that. 
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,754


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 28, 2014, 09:29:11 PM »
« Edited: October 28, 2014, 09:36:17 PM by realisticidealist »

Either Begich or M. Udall (or both) wins. I think Begich winning is fairly likely, actually.

I don't think there are any real "upset" Republican victory possibilities in the Senate. I don't think Brown has much chance, and an Iowa or Colorado or Alaska victory wouldn't be an upset. Hagan being upset is possible, but unlikely. Roberts winning isn't an upset, really. Some could be closer than expected, but I don't count that as an upset.

For Governors, Republicans could fairly easily win Connecticut and/or Massachusetts. Those could be considered upsets, I guess.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 28, 2014, 09:38:14 PM »

I think some strong-red district like UT-04, AR-02, LA-06, KS-02, WV-02 will be an unexpected gain/hold for democrats.
It's hard to talk about republican senate pickups in red or swing states as upsets, really. They would have to win in a state like NH where they're behind both in polls and fundamentals for it to be considered an upset.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 28, 2014, 09:54:32 PM »

I think some strong-red district like UT-04, AR-02, LA-06, KS-02, WV-02 will be an unexpected gain/hold for democrats.

LA-06 is going to a runoff no matter what happens on election night.
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,634
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 28, 2014, 10:02:15 PM »

I think some strong-red district like UT-04, AR-02, LA-06, KS-02, WV-02 will be an unexpected gain/hold for democrats.

LA-06 is going to a runoff no matter what happens on election night.
Is that the district where the lizard is running?
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 28, 2014, 10:10:12 PM »

I think some strong-red district like UT-04, AR-02, LA-06, KS-02, WV-02 will be an unexpected gain/hold for democrats.

LA-06 is going to a runoff no matter what happens on election night.
Is that the district where the lizard is running?

Yep. The biggest reason for upset potential is if one oft the lesser-funded Republicans makes the runoff with him.
Logged
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 28, 2014, 11:16:33 PM »

An upset has to be someone currently trailing by a solid margin in the polls or a complete unexpected. Gardner winning in Colorado is fairly expected at this point.
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,010
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 29, 2014, 01:31:08 AM »

I think Brown or Pryor winning would qualify as an upset.
Logged
Mr. Reactionary
blackraisin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,794
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.45, S: -3.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 29, 2014, 01:49:18 AM »

New Hampshire may be doing that thing New Hampshire does when it decides to vote for the opposite party for the hell of it. New Hampshire elects everything at the same time and is prone to wild swings. Polls suggest D wins for Shaheen and Kuster, tossup for CSP. If someone says something stupid or the winds blow the wrong way, I could see the GOP could pickup any combination of the 3, and also the state legislature. Again, that's dependent on more mini-Akins or 1 big Akin in the last week.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,351
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 29, 2014, 06:37:52 AM »

Grimes pulling it out will get us out of runoff situation in Ga and La and AK indifference, hoping for a miracle.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,371
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 29, 2014, 07:19:06 AM »

Nunn winning outright next Tuesday would qualify as an upset, but is still plausible enough to discuss.
Logged
Modernity has failed us
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,315
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 29, 2014, 07:45:32 AM »

No upset within reason on election night will upstage Eric Cantor losing in the primary.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,940


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 29, 2014, 07:55:30 AM »

New Hampshire may be doing that thing New Hampshire does when it decides to vote for the opposite party for the hell of it. New Hampshire elects everything at the same time and is prone to wild swings. Polls suggest D wins for Shaheen and Kuster, tossup for CSP. If someone says something stupid or the winds blow the wrong way, I could see the GOP could pickup any combination of the 3, and also the state legislature. Again, that's dependent on more mini-Akins or 1 big Akin in the last week.

This. It wouldn't surprise me if Shaheen and both reps lost on Election Day, but it would be shocking.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 29, 2014, 09:20:02 AM »

New Hampshire may be doing that thing New Hampshire does when it decides to vote for the opposite party for the hell of it. New Hampshire elects everything at the same time and is prone to wild swings. Polls suggest D wins for Shaheen and Kuster, tossup for CSP. If someone says something stupid or the winds blow the wrong way, I could see the GOP could pickup any combination of the 3, and also the state legislature. Again, that's dependent on more mini-Akins or 1 big Akin in the last week.

This. It wouldn't surprise me if Shaheen and both reps lost on Election Day, but it would be shocking.

I agree about New Hampshire.  Nunn winning outright and a victory by any of the following candidates are also possible upsets: Mark Udall, Braley, Fung, the R in NV-4, Begich, Larry Hogan, Tillis, Nick Casey, Mike Bost, Pat Roberts or Greg Orman (either way, the media can and will spin this as an upset Tongue ), Mike Schauer, the Dem in ND's at-large seat, Dennis Richardson, the Dem in KS-2, the Dem in MI-11, Andrew Romanoff, Chuck Hassebrook, and the Dem in UT-4.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 29, 2014, 12:13:55 PM »

Begich is probably the easiest answer here.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 29, 2014, 01:18:54 PM »

KS-02 is not going to flip, guys.

Basing off of what would be an upset in Atlas, not to the nation at large, I think Brown, Tillis, Nunn or Grimes winning are the most plausible upsets.
Logged
KCDem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,928


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 29, 2014, 10:11:12 PM »

Huelskamp losing. Just imagine it for a second...
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 29, 2014, 10:18:10 PM »

No upset within reason on election night will upstage Eric Cantor losing in the primary.

That was a remarkable night.

Anyway, I want to echo many of my fellow GOP posters and still feel that a victory for Scott Brown could happen, but by their very definition "upsets" are the results we don't see coming.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.062 seconds with 11 queries.