Reagan Library announces GOP presidential debate for September 16, 2015
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 11:11:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Reagan Library announces GOP presidential debate for September 16, 2015
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Reagan Library announces GOP presidential debate for September 16, 2015  (Read 1014 times)
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 30, 2014, 08:47:15 PM »

Mark your calendars:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/30/2016-republican-presidential-debates_n_6079122.html

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
New_Conservative
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,139
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2014, 08:52:27 PM »

Hopefully they don't follow through with their idiotic ban on media outlets hosting debates.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,096
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2014, 08:53:08 PM »

Hopefully they don't follow through with their idiotic ban on media outlets hosting debates.
I hope so. Allowing Fox to have a monopoly on the debates will result in a stronger chance for an Akin moment, which we do not need.
Logged
Slander and/or Libel
Figs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,338


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 30, 2014, 09:09:17 PM »

Please proceed, daveosupremo.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 30, 2014, 10:00:18 PM »

Is it just me, or does their "debates crackdown" sound awfully authoritarian? I thought the GOP loved liberty or something.
Logged
MadmanMotley
Bmotley
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,343
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.29, S: -5.91

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 30, 2014, 10:57:25 PM »

Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 30, 2014, 11:01:20 PM »

The war on women narrative originated when Stephanopoulos asked Romney about states being able to ban contraception in a debate
Whatever the cause is, it can't be our policies! It's the media! It's the voters! Everyone's out to get us poor white males!
Logged
Vega
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,253
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 31, 2014, 09:55:13 AM »

Didn't see that coming.
Logged
New_Conservative
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,139
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 31, 2014, 07:43:34 PM »

Hopefully they don't follow through with their idiotic ban on media outlets hosting debates.

Why? The war on women narrative originated when Stephanopoulos asked Romney about states being able to ban contraception in a debate. Romney had never even mentioned such a thing in the past. The question was clearly asked to start a narrative about the GOP wanting to ban birth control. In the second general election debate in 2012, Romney spent half the debate arguing with Candy Crowley. The third debate was no better. The GOP doesn't do itself any favors by participating in debates with hyperpartisan moderators. Primary debates should be conducted by Republican moderators. General election debates should be conducted by non-partisan moderators, or at the very least, moderators who have not let their bias show during previous debates.

Because the candidates need to be more exposed to the voters, showing them on Fox News is not exactly exposing them to the voters.
Logged
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,823
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 31, 2014, 11:15:09 PM »

Hopefully they don't follow through with their idiotic ban on media outlets hosting debates.

Why? The war on women narrative originated when Stephanopoulos asked Romney about states being able to ban contraception in a debate. Romney had never even mentioned such a thing in the past. The question was clearly asked to start a narrative about the GOP wanting to ban birth control. In the second general election debate in 2012, Romney spent half the debate arguing with Candy Crowley. The third debate was no better. The GOP doesn't do itself any favors by participating in debates with hyperpartisan moderators. Primary debates should be conducted by Republican moderators. General election debates should be conducted by non-partisan moderators, or at the very least, moderators who have not let their bias show during previous debates.

Because the candidates need to be more exposed to the voters, showing them on Fox News is not exactly exposing them to the voters.

Fox News viewers are the only ones who will vote in Republican Primaries, just as MSNBC viewers are the only people who vote in Democratic Primaries.
Logged
New_Conservative
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,139
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 31, 2014, 11:16:31 PM »

Hopefully they don't follow through with their idiotic ban on media outlets hosting debates.

Why? The war on women narrative originated when Stephanopoulos asked Romney about states being able to ban contraception in a debate. Romney had never even mentioned such a thing in the past. The question was clearly asked to start a narrative about the GOP wanting to ban birth control. In the second general election debate in 2012, Romney spent half the debate arguing with Candy Crowley. The third debate was no better. The GOP doesn't do itself any favors by participating in debates with hyperpartisan moderators. Primary debates should be conducted by Republican moderators. General election debates should be conducted by non-partisan moderators, or at the very least, moderators who have not let their bias show during previous debates.

Because the candidates need to be more exposed to the voters, showing them on Fox News is not exactly exposing them to the voters.

Fox News viewers are the only ones who will vote in Republican Primaries, just as MSNBC viewers are the only people who vote in Democratic Primaries.

I agree, but I doubt the Democratic debates are only going to be on MSNBC.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 31, 2014, 11:21:27 PM »

Hopefully they don't follow through with their idiotic ban on media outlets hosting debates.

Why? The war on women narrative originated when Stephanopoulos asked Romney about states being able to ban contraception in a debate. Romney had never even mentioned such a thing in the past. The question was clearly asked to start a narrative about the GOP wanting to ban birth control. In the second general election debate in 2012, Romney spent half the debate arguing with Candy Crowley. The third debate was no better. The GOP doesn't do itself any favors by participating in debates with hyperpartisan moderators. Primary debates should be conducted by Republican moderators. General election debates should be conducted by non-partisan moderators, or at the very least, moderators who have not let their bias show during previous debates.

Because the candidates need to be more exposed to the voters, showing them on Fox News is not exactly exposing them to the voters.

Fox News viewers are the only ones who will vote in Republican Primaries, just as MSNBC viewers are the only people who vote in Democratic Primaries.

I agree, but I doubt the Democratic debates are only going to be on MSNBC.

Assuming there even are any Democratic debates.  If HRC gets no serious challengers, and she leads the token opposition by 60+ points in the polls, then she might refuse to debate.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 13 queries.