2014 US Congressional Election Results
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:08:10 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2014 US Congressional Election Results
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56 57 58 59 60 ... 71
Author Topic: 2014 US Congressional Election Results  (Read 187596 times)
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,748
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1350 on: November 08, 2014, 12:18:08 AM »

It's not surprising that the CO race was close. Latinos made of 14% of the electorate. Udall's ground game worked.

No, if it worked, he would've won.
Logged
Panda Express
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,578


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1351 on: November 08, 2014, 12:24:56 AM »

It's not surprising that the CO race was close. Latinos made of 14% of the electorate. Udall's ground game worked.

I know you're trolling but Udall lost Pueblo County. That's proof Hispanics were taking a siesta on election day
Logged
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,946


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1352 on: November 08, 2014, 12:58:41 AM »

Then why is this race going back into the uncalled column? No way Gardner has won yet. He's up only 45,000.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1353 on: November 08, 2014, 01:05:01 AM »

It's not surprising that the CO race was close. Latinos made of 14% of the electorate. Udall's ground game worked.

I know you're trolling but Udall lost Pueblo County. That's proof Hispanics were taking a siesta on election day

On the SOS site, Udall won Pueblo County by 262 votes.
Logged
Panda Express
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,578


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1354 on: November 08, 2014, 01:10:54 AM »

It's not surprising that the CO race was close. Latinos made of 14% of the electorate. Udall's ground game worked.

I know you're trolling but Udall lost Pueblo County. That's proof Hispanics were taking a siesta on election day

On the SOS site, Udall won Pueblo County by 262 votes.

It must have just flipped with the latest numbers today. Well whatever, the point still stands as Oballer won by 14 points in 2012
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1355 on: November 08, 2014, 01:34:30 AM »

I'm probably going to do a bigger post on this when I have time, but here's a precinct-level map of the Alaska Senate election day precinct vote results.  As usual for Alaska precinct-level data, this doesn't reflect any absentee or early votes, which are not broken down by precinct.  A minor candidate supposedly won the Southwest Alaskan bush precinct in yellow.  That will probably be a deep shade of red when the results are made official.



Here's a map of the election day precinct vote results by county equivalent.  Note that I didn't attempt to allocate the absentee and early votes to the county equivalents.  It's too early to do so and there is no reliable way to do so out in the bush, anyway.



Finally, here is the county equivalent swing in the election day precinct vote results from 2008 to 2014.  I measured swing by difference in overall margin between the two candidates running in those years.  Again, I didn't allocate the absentee, early or questioned votes in either year in order to make an apples-to-apples comparison.  Because HD and precinct lines have changed since 2008, this is the only swing map one can make.



Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,541
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1356 on: November 08, 2014, 01:37:28 AM »

I'm probably going to do a bigger post on this when I have time, but here's a precinct-level map of the Alaska Senate election day precinct vote results.  As usual for Alaska precinct-level data, this doesn't reflect any absentee or early votes, which are not broken down by precinct.  A minor candidate supposedly won the Southwest Alaskan bush precinct in yellow.  That will probably be a deep shade of red when the results are made official.



Here's a map of the election day precinct vote results by county equivalent.  Note that I didn't attempt to allocate the absentee and early votes to the county equivalents.  It's too early to do so and there is no reliable way to do so out in the bush, anyway.



Finally, here is the county equivalent swing in the election day precinct vote results from 2008 to 2014.  I measured swing by difference in overall margin between the two candidates running in those years.  Again, I didn't allocate the absentee, early or questioned votes in either year in order to make an apples-to-apples comparison.  Because HD and precinct lines have changed since 2008, this is the only swing map one can make.





Do you have a map showing the racial/ethnic breakdown by precinct? 
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1357 on: November 08, 2014, 01:39:29 AM »

So... Udall lost Jefferson by 120 votes... sigh.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,680
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1358 on: November 08, 2014, 01:43:33 AM »

Great work on the Alaska maps, cinyc. I was wondering about the swing from 2008 and hoping someone would make a map. It looks more or less like I expected - swing to Begich in the Native areas, swing to the GOP in the Southeast.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1359 on: November 08, 2014, 01:44:53 AM »

Do you have a map showing the racial/ethnic breakdown by precinct? 

No.  I don't think that data is easily available, either.  You should be able to find the data for county equivalents on the Census website.  The general rule is that except in the Juneau area, the redder the county equivalent, the more Alaska Native it is.
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,541
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1360 on: November 08, 2014, 01:52:34 AM »

Do you have a map showing the racial/ethnic breakdown by precinct?  

No.  I don't think that data is easily available, either.  You should be able to find the data for county equivalents on the Census website.  The general rule is that except in the Juneau area, the redder the county equivalent, the more Alaska Native it is.

That's pretty much what I suspected -that most whites are settled in or around Anchorage and Juneau with the vast hinterlands dominated by native Alaskans.  I just wanted visual proof to see if I was right, whether the racial breakdown corresponds to the vote.  
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,680
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1361 on: November 08, 2014, 02:11:07 AM »

Do you have a map showing the racial/ethnic breakdown by precinct?  

No.  I don't think that data is easily available, either.  You should be able to find the data for county equivalents on the Census website.  The general rule is that except in the Juneau area, the redder the county equivalent, the more Alaska Native it is.

That's pretty much what I suspected -that most whites are settled in or around Anchorage and Juneau with the vast hinterlands dominated by native Alaskans.  I just wanted visual proof to see if I was right, whether the racial breakdown corresponds to the vote.  

here's a quick, crude map I made using the Census DataMapper

Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1362 on: November 08, 2014, 02:13:30 AM »

Great work on the Alaska maps, cinyc. I was wondering about the swing from 2008 and hoping someone would make a map. It looks more or less like I expected - swing to Begich in the Native areas, swing to the GOP in the Southeast.

It will be interesting to see if the swing in the Southeast holds of you allocate the early and absentee votes.  Juneau has a lot of remaining absentees.  It might be that Republicans waited until election day to vote.

Here's a chart of the swing for each county equivalent.  Positive numbers are pro-Begich.  Negative numbers are pro-Sullivan.  Sullivan really cleaned up in Mat-Su and the Kenai Peninsula compared to Stevens in 2008.  And there are more votes there than in the bush county equivalents that swung heavily to Begich.  Anchorage swung slightly to Begich.

Logged
Panda Express
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,578


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1363 on: November 08, 2014, 05:04:51 AM »
« Edited: November 08, 2014, 05:10:57 AM by Vox Populi »

So... Udall lost Jefferson by 120 votes... sigh.

Actually, he just flipped it (winning it by about 600 votes).

So Udall managed to win all three of the suburb counties and still lose by about 2 points. Turnout in Denver was 10% below statewide turnout
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,069
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1364 on: November 08, 2014, 07:28:35 AM »
« Edited: November 08, 2014, 07:52:51 AM by Torie »

Another vote dump and McSally's ahead by 317.

Edit: ANOTHER (I think the rest of Cochise...?) and she's at 509.

McSally seems to be rising from the dead, and now has the edge again.

"Republican Martha McSally’s lead in the closely-contested Congressional District 2 race shrunk to 317 votes Friday night when an additional batch of Pima County early ballots were tabulated.
...
The Pima County Elections Department counted about 16,000 more votes, mostly early ballots late Friday. More than 10,200 of them fell into Congressional District 2.

The latest vote tabulation released Friday evening leaves Pima County with up to 12,000 more votes to count. Those are mostly provisional ballots that have to be verified, some of which will ultimately be disqualified.

Cochise County has another 1,100 provisional ballots to verify and count.

County officials expect to count more ballots and release updated totals Saturday afternoon."

Crunching the numbers from the above data, and what Nathan put up, Barber using the same trend lines closes the gap by 341 votes, assuming all the provisional ballots are accepted as valid, all of which will not be. That's 168 votes short of the finish line for him.



It does appear checking the Cochise County elections website, that all of its votes have been counted (with the last 1,100 provisional ballot vote dump giving McSally a huge boost, bumping her lead up from 317 to 509 per Nathan's reporting).

We might know one way or the other this afternoon whether the Pubs have picked up their 247th seat. At the moment however, the McSally camp must be a lot happier today than it was a couple of days ago.

Logged
KCDem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,928


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1365 on: November 08, 2014, 08:12:19 AM »

So... Udall lost Jefferson by 120 votes... sigh.

Actually, he just flipped it (winning it by about 600 votes).

So Udall managed to win all three of the suburb counties and still lose by about 2 points. Turnout in Denver was 10% below statewide turnout

There are still thousands of ballots to be counted in Denver. So you can't say that yet.
Logged
5280
MagneticFree
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,404
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.97, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1366 on: November 08, 2014, 08:43:19 AM »

http://results.enr.clarityelections.com/CO/53335/148748/Web01/en/summary.html

So Udall won all the suburb counties and still lost?  Wow, bunch of idiots living in Denver voted for the Uterus.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,303


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1367 on: November 08, 2014, 08:58:45 AM »

http://results.enr.clarityelections.com/CO/53335/148748/Web01/en/summary.html

So Udall won all the suburb counties and still lost?  Wow, bunch of idiots living in Denver voted for the Uterus.

Yeah, good luck ever winning a presidential election in Colorado again.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,748
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1368 on: November 08, 2014, 09:08:32 AM »

http://results.enr.clarityelections.com/CO/53335/148748/Web01/en/summary.html

So Udall won all the suburb counties and still lost?  Wow, bunch of idiots living in Denver voted for the Uterus.

Yeah, good luck ever winning a presidential election in Colorado again.

Colorado might favor the Democrats when it comes to the presidential elections, but if they can't win races like this, it's gonna be a problem. The Democrats' inability to get out their voters in this race and others around the country is a catastrophic failure on their part.
Logged
5280
MagneticFree
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,404
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.97, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1369 on: November 08, 2014, 09:31:47 AM »

http://results.enr.clarityelections.com/CO/53335/148748/Web01/en/summary.html

So Udall won all the suburb counties and still lost?  Wow, bunch of idiots living in Denver voted for the Uterus.

Yeah, good luck ever winning a presidential election in Colorado again.
Ex Californians, I tell you. 
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,748
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1370 on: November 08, 2014, 09:46:57 AM »

http://results.enr.clarityelections.com/CO/53335/148748/Web01/en/summary.html

So Udall won all the suburb counties and still lost?  Wow, bunch of idiots living in Denver voted for the Uterus.

Yeah, good luck ever winning a presidential election in Colorado again.
Ex Californians, I tell you. 

Yeah, and the reason New Hampshire is Democratic is because of those damn Massholes.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1371 on: November 08, 2014, 11:09:06 AM »

Here's Cohn's succinct explanation + change from 2010 map.
Logged
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,232
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1372 on: November 08, 2014, 12:18:14 PM »

Colorado might favor the Democrats when it comes to the presidential elections, but if they can't win races like this, it's gonna be a problem. The Democrats' inability to get out their voters in this race and others around the country is a catastrophic failure on their part.

Udall may have lost and we may also have lost the CO Senate (by a single seat), but Hickenlooper was reelected along with a Democratic Majority in the CO House. Democrats are still running stronger in Colorado than in other states that are widely considered to be more Democratic-leaning (such as PA). I'm disappointed that we didn't do better, but ultimately, Colorado is still in swing-state territory.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,069
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1373 on: November 08, 2014, 01:15:34 PM »

In other news, my number crunching projects Ose "cruising" to victory in CA-07 by 216 votes. The late votes just aren't working as well as the Dems hoped so far (at least in CA-07 and AZ-02), except in CA-52, well, in the context of the Pub getting some really bad press at the end.

Logged
Vega
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,253
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1374 on: November 08, 2014, 01:33:03 PM »

Shame. I was really hoping that Bera could hold on. He's got to be my favorite Unitarian Universalist elected in the past 10 years.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56 57 58 59 60 ... 71  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.064 seconds with 12 queries.