MW: The Midwest Pro-Workers and Pro-Growth Amendment Bill (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 04:41:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  MW: The Midwest Pro-Workers and Pro-Growth Amendment Bill (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MW: The Midwest Pro-Workers and Pro-Growth Amendment Bill (Passed)  (Read 1438 times)
RR1997
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,997
United States


« on: November 09, 2014, 12:59:58 PM »
« edited: November 09, 2014, 01:40:21 PM by RR1997 »

I'm undecided at the moment, and I'm open up to debate.
Logged
RR1997
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,997
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2014, 04:54:30 PM »

225 is excessive, that is nearly 2/3rds of the year off. I do believe that Family Leave is important, however, I disagree with the length.

You're right. Maybe shortening the length is a good idea.
Logged
RR1997
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,997
United States


« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2014, 09:53:55 PM »

Here's my amendment:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

So the only change in your amendment is changing the number of days back to 225 days, right? I'm undecided, but lean towards supporting this. I also have to say that 225 is a bit excessive.
Logged
RR1997
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,997
United States


« Reply #3 on: November 22, 2014, 06:16:55 AM »
« Edited: November 22, 2014, 07:08:50 AM by RR1997 »

Eh...I'm still undecided. Where's GAWorth?

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.