Federal Marriage Amendment
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 10:30:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Federal Marriage Amendment
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: Federal Marriage Amendment  (Read 9393 times)
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: May 02, 2004, 07:41:11 PM »

Let the states decide, its a states rights issue. But I believe the govt has the right to use carrot and stick w/federal funding if they wish.
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: May 02, 2004, 08:26:06 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: May 02, 2004, 09:11:37 PM »

Dude banning Oral sex is going to get rocks thrown at you by 75% of this nation. lol
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: May 02, 2004, 09:24:40 PM »

I'm not saying we should. Neither do I believe that homosexual sex should be banned. I'm just saying that it's immoral.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: May 02, 2004, 10:24:55 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



That's absurd.  What possible difference could it make?
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: May 02, 2004, 11:04:46 PM »

If it were illegalized? That's not what I want. I'm saying it's immoral. I don't think sodomy should be illegal, though if it were illegal (along with oral and anal sex) AIDS would greatly decrease in the US.
Logged
migrendel
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,672
Italy


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: May 03, 2004, 02:54:03 PM »

While I understand that it is not relevant to procreation, I do not see where the issue is. There are holes and things to put in the holes. It's just an inventive use of the human body.
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: May 03, 2004, 03:11:40 PM »

it's extremely unnatural and missing the entire point. If it's unnatural, it is therefore immoral.

However, I'm not going to illegalize it. What two adults do in the bedroom is fine.
Logged
migrendel
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,672
Italy


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: May 03, 2004, 03:48:52 PM »

That only holds true if you believe in Natural Law, which most people got over in the eighteenth century. Besides, eating corn on the cob with little holders that look like corn on the cob, wearing clothes, and using toilet paper are all concepts alien to the evolutionary paradigm and not justified by a natural impulse but no one opposes them as unnatural.
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: May 03, 2004, 03:55:18 PM »

Actually, natural law was redefined by Darwin in the 19th century. Natural Law is not a religious belief, it's a requirement for the evolutionary survival of humanity.

I can picture you a hundred years from now murdering a 3-year-old boy, and when I criticize you, you'll say "Morality? Humanity got over that centuries ago..."
Logged
migrendel
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,672
Italy


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: May 04, 2004, 03:00:05 PM »

I think you are confusing Natural Selection, a Darwinian idea not suited for analysis here, with Natural Law, a doctrine expounded by St. Thomas Aquinas that would be ridiculously out of place here.
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #61 on: May 04, 2004, 03:27:03 PM »

In addition to Natural Selection, Darwin had Natural Law.
Logged
migrendel
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,672
Italy


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #62 on: May 05, 2004, 04:47:57 PM »

Perhaps he borrowed from it, but it certainly didn't start with him.
Logged
migrendel
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,672
Italy


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #63 on: May 05, 2004, 07:47:21 PM »

Well, I can agree that he probably incorporated elements of it into his interpretations of his data.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.227 seconds with 12 queries.