Why did Peters do so well?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 03:51:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Why did Peters do so well?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Peters do so well?  (Read 408 times)
socaldem
skolodji
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,040


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 11, 2014, 01:58:40 AM »
« edited: November 11, 2014, 10:15:16 PM by socaldem »

Yes, Terri Lynn Land was a disaster, but I find Peters' 13.2 percent margin surprising.

He outperformed , Durbin (10.0), Franken (10.3), Tom Udall (10.8 ), and even nearly matched the margin of Coons in Delaware (13.4).

I don't think the headwinds in Michigan were as strong as in some of the other states where Durbin had to contend with the Quinn anvil and Udall had to deal with the Martinez landslide, for example.

Also, Peters' strength in Oakland County makes him a really strong Michigan candidate. His 15 point margin there is especially impressive compared to Guv candidate Schauer's nearly 13 point deficit.
Logged
moderatevoter
ModerateVAVoter
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,381


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2014, 02:00:14 AM »

You answered your question in your first line.

I'm very curious as to how this race would have looked like with Mike Rogers as the Republican nominee.
Logged
dmmidmi
dmwestmi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,095
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2014, 08:01:53 AM »

You answered your question in your first line.

I have to agree here, and this is the same reason that Debbie Stabenow did so well in 2012. Despite having a decent amount of name recognition, both Hoekstra and Land came stumbling out of the gate in their Senatorial campaigns. Combined with the fact that Stabenow and Peters ran strong campaigns, and the end result isn't surprising.

Something else to keep in mind--the last time someone from West Michigan was elected to either the Governorship or the US Senate was 1946, when Arthur Vandenberg won re-election for the fourth time. The list of Senators since Vandenberg?

Moody (Detroit)
Potter (Lapeer/Cheboygan)
Hart (Detroit)
Riegle (Flint)
Abraham (Lansing)
Stabenow (Lansing)
Ferguson (Detroit)
McNamara (Detroit)
Griffin (Detroit/Traverse City)
Levin (Detroit)
Peters (Detroit)

As someone who has lived in several places in the Lower Peninsula my whole life, I can tell you anecdotally that West Michigan is culturally secluded from much of the rest of the state. Hoekstra's fiery brand of conservatism doesn't translate well to suburban areas in Oakland, Macomb, and Wayne counties that would otherwise consider sending a Republican to the Senate, and Terri Lynn Land's "I'm a mom!" shtick may have appealed to the Stepford Wives-types that live in Kentwood, Grandville, and Ada, but came across as tone-deaf and condescending to voter-rich populations in Metro Detroit, who didn't find her endearing.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.206 seconds with 12 queries.