HuffPost on Dem targets in 2016: IL, WI, LA, NH, FL, GA, NC, PA, AZ, OH, IA, KY (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 09:54:35 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  HuffPost on Dem targets in 2016: IL, WI, LA, NH, FL, GA, NC, PA, AZ, OH, IA, KY (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: HuffPost on Dem targets in 2016: IL, WI, LA, NH, FL, GA, NC, PA, AZ, OH, IA, KY  (Read 1077 times)
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,634
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70
« on: November 06, 2014, 07:37:22 PM »
Quote from: MW Rep Vega on November 06, 2014, 07:15:06 PM
Quote from: IceSpear on November 06, 2014, 07:09:36 PM
Why would they list LA and KY but not MO?

I guess because Paul has been so vocal and might run for President, and Vitter had a prostitution scandal not too long ago.

Blunt has been your rank and file Republican so far.
Prostitutes aren't the reason why HuffPost thinks that Louisiana is winnable. It's because Vitter will probably go for Governor, and therefore the seat may be open.
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,634
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2014, 07:52:02 PM »
Quote from: Keystone Phil on November 06, 2014, 07:39:00 PM
We talk about McCaskill being a goner in 2012 because of Missouri's rightward shift...and now people here want to talk about non-scandal plagued Blunt definitely being vulnerable? Oh, Atlas Forum.
Isn't Blunt reasonably unpopular though? Nixon could run as well...
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,634
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2014, 12:09:55 AM »
Quote from: Keystone Phil on November 06, 2014, 08:02:08 PM
Quote from: morgieb on November 06, 2014, 07:52:02 PM
Quote from: Keystone Phil on November 06, 2014, 07:39:00 PM
We talk about McCaskill being a goner in 2012 because of Missouri's rightward shift...and now people here want to talk about non-scandal plagued Blunt definitely being vulnerable? Oh, Atlas Forum.
Isn't Blunt reasonably unpopular though? Nixon could run as well...

Nixon is going to run and be a legitimate contender after the Ferguson fiasco? Really?
Did not know/remember that. Cliffs?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.