Is Maine trending GOP? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 04:07:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Is Maine trending GOP? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Is Maine trending GOP?  (Read 7645 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,742


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« on: November 08, 2014, 05:01:53 PM »

No. It was considered a swing state in 2000.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,742


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2014, 09:19:01 PM »

The leftie war on white America is hurting them

In most places, anyway. They did gerrymander Massachusetts quite well, but even there Baker won non Cambridge whites.

Yeah. It's interesting.  It seems like a lot of Middlesex County  just doesn't like Martha Coakley.  In the 2010 special and now in 2014 Gov race, that was her biggest underperformance.

Mass is just simply never going to send a Republican to Congress again because of the gerrymandering.  Dems were smart to dump Tierney. 

The irony of someone with SF in their username claiming that Democrats only win white areas because of gerrymandering. Yeah, that's why the >70% white Castro votes like 90% Democratic. Obviously.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,742


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2014, 05:37:44 AM »

The leftie war on white America is hurting them

In most places, anyway. They did gerrymander Massachusetts quite well, but even there Baker won non Cambridge whites.

Yeah. It's interesting.  It seems like a lot of Middlesex County  just doesn't like Martha Coakley.  In the 2010 special and now in 2014 Gov race, that was her biggest underperformance.

Mass is just simply never going to send a Republican to Congress again because of the gerrymandering.  Dems were smart to dump Tierney.  

The irony of someone with SF in their username claiming that Democrats only win white areas because of gerrymandering. Yeah, that's why the >70% white Castro votes like 90% Democratic. Obviously.

That is because the Castro is the homosexual vote. I said that Massachusetts congressional districts were gerrymandered, not sure where you got anything about whites from... But white folks as a whole are solidly Republicans per the exit polls - you can't take one radical activist neighborhood of San Francisco and compare it to the nationwide white community

Well, as someone with SF in your username, I'm sure you are aware that the Castro isn't the only overwhelmingly white neighborhood in or around SF that is heavily Democratic. The cities of Mill Valley and Piedmont are both very white and very Democratic.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,742


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2014, 12:52:25 AM »

Of course, but nothing to the tune of 90% outside of the Castro or Haight. This area is full of granola eaters and latte drinkers- that embraced the counterculturist lifestyle and were unable to reside in a traditional American community.

The 20th most Democratic city in California is hardly unique for having heavily Democratic areas.

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=94829
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 12 queries.