2016 Democratic Presidential Primary Poll (No Hillary/Biden) - November 2014
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 08:34:04 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  2016 Democratic Presidential Primary Poll (No Hillary/Biden) - November 2014		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Hillary/Biden refuse to run. Who is most likely to win the nomination at this point?
#1
Howard Dean		  
#2
Deval Patrick		  
#3
Joe Manchin		  
#4
Martin O'Malley		  
#5
Ed Rendell		  
#6
Bernie Sanders		  
#7
Brian Schweitzer		  
#8
Jim Webb		  
#9
Tammy Baldwin		  
#10
Steve Bullock		  
#11
George Clooney		  
#12
Andrew Cuomo		  
#13
Julian Castro		  
#14
Rahm Emanuel		  
#15
Michelle Obama		  
#16
Russ Feingold		  
#17
Al Gore		  
#18
Luis Guitterez		  
#19
Maggie Hassan		  
#20
John Hickenlooper		  
#21
Amy Klobuchar		  
#22
Jeanne Shaheen		  
#23
William H. McRaven		  
#24
Janet Napolitano		  
#25
Jay Nixon		  
#26
Tim Kaine		  
#27
Kathleen Sebelius		  
#28
Tom Wolf		  
#29
Antonio Villiagarosa		  
#30
Kirsten Gillibrand		  
#31
Mark Warner		  
#32
Elizabeth Warren		  
#33
Someone else (please post your pick)		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 71

Author Topic: 2016 Democratic Presidential Primary Poll (No Hillary/Biden) - November 2014  (Read 4168 times)
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,685
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 07, 2014, 12:26:51 PM »
Just like the republican one. For obvious reasons, I've eliminated Hillary and Biden - this is about predicting the nominee from the wide open field that will arrive if the two big names don't run.
Logged
Mister Mets
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,440
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2014, 12:41:57 PM »
If Hillary doesn't run, I think the nomination is between Biden and Kirsten Gilibrand.

Gilibrand is a media savvy Senator who has become a voice on progressive issues. She seems to be doing more to get her name out there than many of her contemporaries in Congress. The party wants to nominate its first woman, and has a tendency to back younger statewide officeholders (JFK, McGovern, Clinton, Obama.)

Without Biden and with Warren seemingly uninterested, there isn't an obvious alternative.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2014, 12:45:21 PM »
Biden is the frontrunner, but he flops, and Warren or Gillibrand picks it up. The Dems have a super thin bench.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,173
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2014, 03:00:53 PM »
The Minnesota Two (Al Franken or Amy Klobuchar) or Gillibrand would have the media,...but I could see Schweitzer pulling off a Jimmy Carter and coming in from behind.
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,684
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2014, 03:33:09 PM »
Gillibrand.
Logged
SWE
SomebodyWhoExists
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,303
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2014, 03:36:26 PM »
Warren or Gillibrand
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,708


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2014, 03:39:59 PM »
Some of these people would never run, and some would have absolutely zero chance (Cuomo, Manchin, LOL).  It could be one of the more obscure ones, and we'd have to find out more about them first.
Logged
ShadowRocket
cb48026
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,461


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2014, 03:40:47 PM »
I think Gillibrand would be the natural choice. The problem being that Cuomo would also likely run and I'm not sure if he would preempt her in this scenario. Barring that, maybe Schweitzer or Warren?
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 07, 2014, 04:24:30 PM »
Warren or Sanders would have a real shot at that point.  there is a romantic impulse that can run wild in Dem primaries, in the absence of a celebrity, big-money candidate that can beat it back with brute force.
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,636
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 07, 2014, 06:57:14 PM »
Toss-up between Gillibrand and Warren (if they run) IMO. Even in a field containing Uncle Joe - he's a lightweight.

Failing that, I have NFI.
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 07, 2014, 07:13:15 PM »
What is with this place? There are a lot of interesting things to talk about in the wake of Tuesday- like how Walker being re-elected, and the GOP winning the senate affect 2016… why are people starting threads pretending Brian Sandoval running for president or Hillary not running are realistic possibilities? Also, who cares whether Martin O'Malley is pretty or not. What is wrong with you people?
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 07, 2014, 07:40:24 PM »

This. Voted Gillibrand.
Logged
Grumpier Than Thou
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,322
United States
Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 08, 2014, 08:32:52 AM »
Should Gillibrand run, she'd win in this scenario.
Logged
Flake
Flo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 08, 2014, 10:38:54 AM »
« Edited: November 08, 2014, 06:15:14 PM by IDS Speaker Flo »
Cory Booker, Amy Klobuchar, Kirsten Gillibrand, in that order.

Oh, I forgot about Warren.
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,059
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 08, 2014, 04:54:23 PM »
I voted for Warren, because she would be the worst candidate for the Democratic Party. But I wonder why so many of you, forum Democrats support one of the most conservative candidates, Kirsten Gillibrand.

Could it be because she is the most electable of all other candidates?
Logged
KCDem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,928


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 08, 2014, 05:25:55 PM »
Obviously Warren.
Logged
Incipimus iterum
1236
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 08, 2014, 06:12:05 PM »
Gillibrand
Logged
Paul Kemp
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,230
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 08, 2014, 06:35:16 PM »
This list is... not good.
Logged
eric82oslo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,501
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.00, S: -5.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 08, 2014, 07:48:15 PM »
I'd say Elizabeth Warren barely ahead of Gillibrand and with Mark Warner and Julian Castro fighting it out for the third position. Probably Castro will have more enthusiastic supporters and beat Warner in the end. Anyways, this 2016 field is clearly a ladies' fight.
Logged
eric82oslo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,501
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.00, S: -5.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: November 08, 2014, 08:23:11 PM »
Quote from: Ljube on November 08, 2014, 04:54:23 PM
I voted for Warren, because she would be the worst candidate for the Democratic Party. But I wonder why so many of you, forum Democrats support one of the most conservative candidates, Kirsten Gillibrand.

Could it be because she is the most electable of all other candidates?


She's so conservative in fact that she's made a huge buzz about gender discrimination. Lol. So so  very very conservative.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: November 09, 2014, 12:14:40 AM »
Quote from: daveosupremo on November 08, 2014, 10:27:39 PM
If Clinton and Warren both run, Warren will win.

Based on what?
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,685
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: November 18, 2014, 09:33:23 PM »
bump
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: November 18, 2014, 11:52:58 PM »

Why?
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,685
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: November 19, 2014, 12:20:21 AM »
To get a few more votes.
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: November 19, 2014, 12:21:49 AM »

Just as a hypothetical, you mean? Doesn't everyone realize Hillary is running at this point?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.063 seconds with 15 queries.