exit polls: D: Clinton leads everywhere; R: Huck leads IA/SC, Bush leads NH
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 11:24:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  exit polls: D: Clinton leads everywhere; R: Huck leads IA/SC, Bush leads NH
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: exit polls: D: Clinton leads everywhere; R: Huck leads IA/SC, Bush leads NH  (Read 1004 times)
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 08, 2014, 07:02:24 PM »

Linking to the copies of the exit polls on Fox's website, but these were conducted by Edison Research as part of the National Election Pool exit poll (the one that all the networks use) this past Tuesday.  These are from the 2014 midterm exit polls for Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina:

Iowa:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/elections/2014/exit-polls?year=2014&type=governor&filter=IA

Dems

Clinton 67%
Warren 11%
Biden 8%
someone else 14%

GOP

Huckabee 18%
Perry 17%
Bush 15%
Paul 14%
Christie 12%
someone else 24%

New Hampshire:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/elections/2014/exit-polls?year=2014&type=governor&filter=NH

Dems

Clinton 64%
Warren 18%
Biden 4%
someone else 14%

GOP

Bush 22%
Paul 21%
Christie 15%
Huckabee 10%
Perry 4%
someone else 29%

South Carolina:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/elections/2014/exit-polls?year=2014&type=governor&filter=SC

Dems

Clinton 68%
Biden 16%
Warren 5%
someone else 11%

GOP

Huckabee 20%
Bush 18%
Christie 12%
Paul 12%
Perry 11%
someone else 28%
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2014, 07:06:17 PM »

The number of Clinton supporters is large enough that you can look at what %age of Clinton supporters voted for the Republican nominee for governor in each of these three states:

Branstad: 19%
Havenstein: 3%
Haley: 7%
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 08, 2014, 07:12:42 PM »

#Hillaryunder70inIowa
#Hillaryunder70inNewHampshire
#Hillaryunder70inSouthCarolina
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 08, 2014, 09:59:06 PM »

I have been saying that Perry is poised for a comeback. He has been all over Iowa. Assuming he is now prepped for debates, he can quickly become the frontrunner there (especially if Huckabee doesn't run)
Logged
eric82oslo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,501
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.00, S: -5.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 09, 2014, 09:55:39 AM »

Iowa:

GOP

Huckabee 18%
Perry 17%
Bush 15%
Paul 14%
Christie 12%
someone else 24%

New Hampshire:

GOP

Bush 22%
Paul 21%
Christie 15%
Huckabee 10%
Perry 4%
someone else 29%

South Carolina:

GOP

Huckabee 20%
Bush 18%
Christie 12%
Paul 12%
Perry 11%
someone else 28%


Basically what this means is that the three moderates would beat the two conservative options in every early state, even if just barely in Iowa. Let's add their percentages together:

Iowa:

Bush+Paul+Christie: 41%
Huckabee+Perry: 35%

New Hampshire:

Bush+Paul+Christie: 58%
Huckabee+Perry: 14%
(not even close)

South Carolina:

Bush+Christie+Paul: 42%
Huckabee+Perry: 31%

Now that's interesting and cuts against the conventional widsom of most pundits' and lay people's opinions.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 09, 2014, 10:24:17 AM »

I have been saying that Perry is poised for a comeback. He has been all over Iowa. Assuming he is now prepped for debates, he can quickly become the frontrunner there (especially if Huckabee doesn't run)

I mean, even if his  debates are a train wreck again, if none of the other candidates run well with it, it's fine. Look at Rick Scott.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 09, 2014, 10:39:39 AM »



Iowa:

GOP

Huckabee 18%
Perry 17%
Bush 15%
Paul 14%
Christie 12%
someone else 24%

New Hampshire:

GOP

Bush 22%
Paul 21%
Christie 15%
Huckabee 10%
Perry 4%
someone else 29%

South Carolina:

GOP

Huckabee 20%
Bush 18%
Christie 12%
Paul 12%
Perry 11%
someone else 28%


Basically what this means is that the three moderates would beat the two conservative options in every early state, even if just barely in Iowa. Let's add their percentages together:

Iowa:

Bush+Paul+Christie: 41%
Huckabee+Perry: 35%

New Hampshire:

Bush+Paul+Christie: 58%
Huckabee+Perry: 14%
(not even close)

South Carolina:

Bush+Christie+Paul: 42%
Huckabee+Perry: 31%

Now that's interesting and cuts against the conventional widsom of most pundits' and lay people's opinions.

I wouldn't call Paul a moderate.  At least my understanding is that he's a libertarian-conservative hybrid, who doesn't exactly fit the conventional conservative-moderate continuum.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 09, 2014, 10:54:48 AM »

I have been saying that Perry is poised for a comeback. He has been all over Iowa. Assuming he is now prepped for debates, he can quickly become the frontrunner there (especially if Huckabee doesn't run)

I mean, even if his  debates are a train wreck again, if none of the other candidates run well with it, it's fine. Look at Rick Scott.

Well, also, Rick Perry has such a low bar for success that even a bad performance would be considered exceeding expectations.
Logged
njwes
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 532
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2014, 03:33:52 AM »

Basically what this means is that the three moderates would beat the two conservative options in every early state, even if just barely in Iowa. Let's add their percentages together:

Iowa:

Bush+Paul+Christie: 41%
Huckabee+Perry: 35%

New Hampshire:

Bush+Paul+Christie: 58%
Huckabee+Perry: 14%
(not even close)

South Carolina:

Bush+Christie+Paul: 42%
Huckabee+Perry: 31%

Now that's interesting and cuts against the conventional widsom of most pundits' and lay people's opinions.


Idk if I'd call Huckabee a conservative in this context; socially/religiously sure, but he has a marked populist streak that's very much out of line with establishment Republican conservative thought. Recall that in 2008 he suggested massive New Deal-style government construction projects as a way of alleviating the effects of the recession.
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,051
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2014, 02:55:44 PM »

Warren polling at respectable levels (11-18%). This is similar to or slightly worse than Obama's numbers in the same period in 2006. Can Clinton be thwarted again?
Logged
New_Conservative
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,139
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2014, 05:58:27 PM »

Warren polling at respectable levels (11-18%). This is similar to or slightly worse than Obama's numbers in the same period in 2006. Can Clinton be thwarted again?


Yes
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 15, 2014, 03:27:36 PM »

Warren polling at respectable levels (11-18%). This is similar to or slightly worse than Obama's numbers in the same period in 2006. Can Clinton be thwarted again?

Yes

Warren is in the same place as Obama was, but Hillary is much higher (in the 60s instead of in the 30s). So no.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationwide_opinion_polling_for_the_Democratic_Party_2008_presidential_candidates
Logged
New_Conservative
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,139
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 16, 2014, 08:14:03 PM »

Warren polling at respectable levels (11-18%). This is similar to or slightly worse than Obama's numbers in the same period in 2006. Can Clinton be thwarted again?

Yes

Warren is in the same place as Obama was, but Hillary is much higher (in the 60s instead of in the 30s). So no.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationwide_opinion_polling_for_the_Democratic_Party_2008_presidential_candidates

#iBELIEVE
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,795
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 25, 2014, 11:36:31 AM »

Warren polling at respectable levels (11-18%). This is similar to or slightly worse than Obama's numbers in the same period in 2006. Can Clinton be thwarted again?

Yes

Warren is in the same place as Obama was, but Hillary is much higher (in the 60s instead of in the 30s). So no.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationwide_opinion_polling_for_the_Democratic_Party_2008_presidential_candidates

Exactly.

Also, Warren will not run. Obama needed to be coaxed into the race by people like Reid and Schumer. Nobody is going to do the same this time with Warren.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 13 queries.