2016 Top Democratic Targets
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 06:17:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2016 Top Democratic Targets
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: 2016 Top Democratic Targets  (Read 3310 times)
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,990
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 11, 2014, 12:54:54 AM »

I would have to put IA-1, NY- 11 (once Grimm is convicted), NY-24, NH-1, ME-2, NV-4, IL-10 at the top of the list. FL-26 probably belongs there too, the district is trending Democratic fast and Garcia still got 49% despite losing in 2008, 2010 and having major ethical issues. The next tier would be the NY-1, NY-21, TX-23, IL-12.
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,381
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2014, 01:21:44 AM »

Doubt about IL-12. It seems that like many similar downstate districts with some almost "southern" overtones, it moves away from Democratic party. After all - Enyart not simply lost: he lost by bigger margin then Barrow in GA, by double-digits...
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2014, 03:11:03 AM »

I am shocked, shocked that everybody underestimated Bost. Not. Tongue


Yea I think it is pretty much gone for the Democrats.
Logged
Mr. Illini
liberty142
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,847
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2014, 02:15:12 PM »

I would say IL-13 is a potential target. IL-12 does act as a southern district and it is probably lost for now. IL-13 is the type of district where turnout will really increase for a Presidential year (minorities and students).

Obviously IL-10 as well. I think Schneider will throw his hat back in the ring for that one.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2014, 02:23:57 PM »

I would say IL-13 is a potential target. IL-12 does act as a southern district and it is probably lost for now. IL-13 is the type of district where turnout will really increase for a Presidential year (minorities and students).

Obviously IL-10 as well. I think Schneider will throw his hat back in the ring for that one.

Yea IL-10 is going to continue to be a calamity every cycle until Bob Dold stops running.
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 11, 2014, 02:26:29 PM »

Reclaiming lost 2014 seats:
NV-04
IA-01
ME-02
NY-01
NH-01
TX-23
IL-10
UT-04
FL-26
NY-24

Taking Republican seats:
CA-21
CA-10
CA-25
CO-06
FL-13
NY-19
MI-01
IL-13
VA-10
IA-03
PA-08
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,706
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 11, 2014, 03:07:08 PM »

It is way too early to do more than vaguely speculate at this point.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2014, 04:29:04 PM »

Blum, Hardy, and Poliquin seem like pretty clear one term wonders.
Logged
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,990
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 11, 2014, 06:19:21 PM »

I think VA-2 would go before VA-10. And Obama did win IL-12 twice so despite Enyart's problems its entirely possible Hillary would carry it.
Logged
GaussLaw
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,279
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 11, 2014, 07:28:26 PM »

Blum, Hardy, and Poliquin seem like pretty clear one term wonders.

Especially Hardy.
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,832
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2014, 07:53:36 PM »

I think the republicans should convince Sheyman to run since it will extend their lease on the seat.

I'm not as pessimistic (though still somewhat pessimistic) about IL-12. I mean Obama won it both times and this is the first time since WWII a republican won it at the congressional level. Also, didn't Stevenson win the current IL-12 both times?

Logged
Vega
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,253
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 11, 2014, 07:59:04 PM »
« Edited: November 11, 2014, 08:00:35 PM by MW Rep Vega »

All of the House races that Republicans won this year will start out as at least tossups in 2016, except for NC-07, GA-12, WV-03 and maybe UT-04.

I think that puts the Democrats at great odds for breaking 200 in 2016.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 11, 2014, 08:04:06 PM »

None. Republicans are probably going to gain House seats in 2016.
Logged
Vega
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,253
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 11, 2014, 08:08:36 PM »

None. Republicans are probably going to gain House seats in 2016.

Either Mary loosing really put you in the dumps or we need a sarcasm tag.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 11, 2014, 08:08:49 PM »

None. Republicans are probably going to gain House seats in 2016.

Seriously?  Where?  The only real red seat dem left is Peterson in Mn-07.
Logged
Flake
Flo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 11, 2014, 08:10:09 PM »

None. Republicans are probably going to gain House seats in 2016.

Seriously?  Where?  The only real red seat dem left is Peterson in Mn-07.

Graham, Murphy, Bradford (or whatever his name is), Nolan (that other guy in MN down south), etc.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 11, 2014, 08:12:30 PM »

I was parodying another poster Tongue
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 11, 2014, 08:29:30 PM »

None. Republicans are probably going to gain House seats in 2016.

Seriously?  Where?  The only real red seat dem left is Peterson in Mn-07.

Graham, Murphy, Bradford (or whatever his name is), Nolan (that other guy in MN down south), etc.

The Nolan seat isn't red.  It went for Obama twice and even went for Kerry in 2004.
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,381
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 12, 2014, 01:31:06 AM »

Reclaiming lost 2014 seats:
NV-04
IA-01
ME-02
NY-01
NH-01
TX-23
IL-10
UT-04
FL-26
NY-24

Taking Republican seats:
CA-21
CA-10
CA-25
CO-06
FL-13
NY-19
MI-01
IL-13
VA-10
IA-03
PA-08

Good luck with beating Gibson in 2016. You will need tons of it. And if Republicans nominate someone like McIlhenny in PA-08, who (fiscal conservative, but almost social liberal) fits the district extremely well - to PA-08 too.
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,381
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: November 12, 2014, 01:35:38 AM »

All of the House races that Republicans won this year will start out as at least tossups in 2016, except for NC-07, GA-12, WV-03 and maybe UT-04.

I think that puts the Democrats at great odds for breaking 200 in 2016.

With present level of polarization, where the whole caucus (with at most 5-7 mavericks) votes as a if it's one person, that means solid Republican control. Democrats better do well in 2018 governor elections, otherwise their party would become "party of the coasts" and few urban hinterland metropolises in addition...
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: November 12, 2014, 09:04:21 AM »

Here's a Politico list of Senate races. WI: Feingold. PA: Sestak. IL: Madigan or Duckworth. NV: ? NH: Hassan isn't inclined to run. FL: No one. NC: Hagan, though they don't know if she wants to run or not. OH: Long list. CO: Coffman. AZ: No idea.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: November 12, 2014, 09:22:28 AM »

Duckworth is apparently leaning heavily against running.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: November 12, 2014, 09:45:34 AM »


That's probably good news. Duckworth strikes me as a boring campaigner.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,940


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: November 12, 2014, 11:38:03 AM »


Good, she would lose.
Logged
Mr. Illini
liberty142
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,847
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: November 12, 2014, 02:16:34 PM »


The frontrunners right now I would say are Madigan or Bustos. Tom Dart is a favorite of mine, but he's not as well known.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.04 seconds with 12 queries.