DEMOCRATS ONLY: Who would you vote for in the primary?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 04:20:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  DEMOCRATS ONLY: Who would you vote for in the primary?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Who would you vote for in the primary?
#1
Hillary Clinton
 
#2
Elizabeth Warren
 
#3
Martin O'Malley
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 92

Author Topic: DEMOCRATS ONLY: Who would you vote for in the primary?  (Read 5123 times)
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: November 15, 2014, 10:33:23 AM »

Warren keeps saying she's not running. Yeah, Christie said the same thing 4 years ago more emphatically before almost changing his mind, but knowing what we now do about Christie's credibility, that was a whole other animal. No reason to think Warren is running.

But I'm skeptical Hillary is a stronger general election candidate than Warren. She actually has a lot of problems that Warren avoids. I also don't take polls this early seriously; Hillary is so much better known than any other Democrat, her head-to-head polling reflects that. A lot of people thought it was too risky to nominate Obama before he won by 7 points. But again, Warren's not running.
Logged
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: November 15, 2014, 10:58:50 AM »

Ehh what a list. Two butch old ladies and a no-name unpopular liberal Governor. Young people are definitely gonna wait in line six hours.

Logged
Grumpier Than Thou
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,319
United States
Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: November 15, 2014, 11:26:14 AM »

Ehh what a list. Two butch old ladies and a no-name unpopular liberal Governor. Young people are definitely gonna wait in line six hours.

Not that it's unexpected, but this post is really awful. Referring to two highly respected and trailblazing female politicians as "butch old ladies" is just a show of your character, but it's not like you haven't shown it before.

And by the way, young people aren't going to line up to choose between Rand Paul, Chris Christie, Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz, Rick Perry, Mike Huckabee, Lindsey Graham and Ben Carson. When your most diverse candidates are also your most extreme and off-putting ones, you've got a problem.
Logged
The Dowager Mod
texasgurl
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,974
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.48, S: -8.57

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: November 15, 2014, 12:20:34 PM »

Ehh what a list. Two butch old ladies and a no-name unpopular liberal Governor. Young people are definitely gonna wait in line six hours.


Seriously?
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: November 15, 2014, 12:44:34 PM »

Ehh what a list. Two butch old ladies and a no-name unpopular liberal Governor. Young people are definitely gonna wait in line six hours.


Seriously?

I predict in 2 years these 2 posts will be a nice microcosm of how the GOP motivated turnout of women.

As a separate point, you won't find a candidate in America who would motivate young voters to turnout more than Warren would. Won't be surprised if she's on the VP shortlist, especially after Sanders and others rile up the base during the primary. Not the best use of Warren in my opinion but she'd be a better pick than the large majority of suggestions you see around here.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: November 15, 2014, 03:52:33 PM »

Clinton, the strongest candidate. I don't know why anyone would pick Warren, as she would lose and bring in negative coattails that will only ensure even further conservative laws enacted in 2017.

Even if she managed to win (probably against a weak Republican), yeah, the fact that Warren would ensure a Republican Congress is a fairly crucial factor that tends to get overlooked.
Logged
tylerm728
Newbie
*
Posts: 2
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: November 16, 2014, 12:56:44 AM »

As far as Democrats go, Brian Schweitzer is definitely my favorite so far.
Logged
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: November 16, 2014, 02:05:16 AM »

As far as Democrats go, Brian Schweitzer is definitely my favorite so far.

I could tolerate a President Schweitzer or President Manchin.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,678
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: November 16, 2014, 02:12:49 AM »

Ehh what a list. Two butch old ladies and a no-name unpopular liberal Governor. Young people are definitely gonna wait in line six hours.

Not that it's unexpected, but this post is really awful. Referring to two highly respected and trailblazing female politicians as "butch old ladies" is just a show of your character, but it's not like you haven't shown it before.

And by the way, young people aren't going to line up to choose between Rand Paul, Chris Christie, Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz, Rick Perry, Mike Huckabee, Lindsey Graham and Ben Carson. When your most diverse candidates are also your most extreme and off-putting ones, you've got a problem.
Christie, Graham and Bush are not Cruz-level extreme by any sense of the word (The TP tries to primary Graham, yet he's somehow as extreme as Cruz. LOLOLOL). Perry isn't moderate, but he's no Cruz.

Jeb Bush is actually a pretty good option for republicans, assuming that his last name isn't a significant drawback.
Logged
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: November 16, 2014, 02:24:17 AM »
« Edited: November 16, 2014, 02:30:45 AM by Reaganfan »

I know it sounds harsh, but I'm being very serious. Especially Warren. No physical appeal whatsoever.



She looks like a mean librarian.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,678
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: November 16, 2014, 04:32:21 AM »

Well, so much for Hillary being the "inevitable nominee"......
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: November 16, 2014, 04:34:39 AM »

I know it sounds harsh, but I'm being very serious. Especially Warren. No physical appeal whatsoever.



She looks like a mean librarian.

"physical appeal" is a rather unimportant quality for a US President.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,873


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: November 16, 2014, 05:20:09 AM »

Former Harvard Law Professor, chaired the Congressional Oversight Panel for the $700 billion TARP program, came up with the idea of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and has written nine books, yet all Naso cares about is that she's "butch."
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,293
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: November 16, 2014, 01:18:52 PM »
« Edited: November 16, 2014, 01:22:51 PM by Cardinal X »

Write-in: Brian Schweitzer
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,921


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: November 16, 2014, 03:21:41 PM »

I know it sounds harsh, but I'm being very serious. Especially Warren. No physical appeal whatsoever.

you supported this guy for president:

Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: November 16, 2014, 03:40:12 PM »

Well, so much for Hillary being the "inevitable nominee"......

I mean, this forum isn't exactly representative of the actual primary electorate...
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: November 16, 2014, 03:50:20 PM »

I like Warren the most, but Hillary.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: November 18, 2014, 05:47:29 PM »

Well, so much for Hillary being the "inevitable nominee"......

Because Atlas Democrats are representative of the country. For one thing, we have like one woman here. In fact, Hillary doing as well among young white males as she is in this poll is telling in and of itself. Would she have even cracked single digits here (and in similar communities) in 2008?
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,293
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: November 18, 2014, 07:19:38 PM »

Well, so much for Hillary being the "inevitable nominee"......

Because Atlas Democrats are representative of the country. For one thing, we have like one woman here. In fact, Hillary doing as well among young white males as she is in this poll is telling in and of itself. Would she have even cracked single digits here (and in similar communities) in 2008?

Err...Hillary didn't win the Democratic nomination in 2008 Tongue
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: November 18, 2014, 07:38:40 PM »

Well, so much for Hillary being the "inevitable nominee"......

Because Atlas Democrats are representative of the country. For one thing, we have like one woman here. In fact, Hillary doing as well among young white males as she is in this poll is telling in and of itself. Would she have even cracked single digits here (and in similar communities) in 2008?

Err...Hillary didn't win the Democratic nomination in 2008 Tongue

Yes, but she got 48% of the vote.
Logged
Oak Hills
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,076
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: November 18, 2014, 09:36:20 PM »

Sanders. But of the options listed, easily Warren.
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,524
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: November 19, 2014, 10:54:29 AM »
« Edited: November 19, 2014, 11:05:01 AM by TDAS04 »

Clinton.  

Reaganfan's sexism is pretty blatant, considering his display name indicates he's a fan of a man who was 69 when he became President.  
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,293
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: November 19, 2014, 11:46:00 AM »

Well, so much for Hillary being the "inevitable nominee"......

Because Atlas Democrats are representative of the country. For one thing, we have like one woman here. In fact, Hillary doing as well among young white males as she is in this poll is telling in and of itself. Would she have even cracked single digits here (and in similar communities) in 2008?

Err...Hillary didn't win the Democratic nomination in 2008 Tongue

Yes, but she got 48% of the vote.

A good chunk of that was due at least in part to the fact that she was running against a black guy Tongue
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 15 queries.