Obama's Exec Order a landmine in waiting for GOP in 2016 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 06:18:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Obama's Exec Order a landmine in waiting for GOP in 2016 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Obama's Exec Order a landmine in waiting for GOP in 2016  (Read 1606 times)
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


« on: November 18, 2014, 10:13:37 AM »

The President plays chess; his opponents play slots.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2014, 05:19:34 PM »

In all of the plausibly competitive 2016 states, this is what I predict will be the net effect of the executive order.  Green means ambiguous or little net impact:



Basically, it makes sense only if they are confident it will help push Florida left of the tipping point.  There will also be Democratic risks/GOP opportunities in the rural North that should be taken seriously.
I don't see how the executive order impacts Michigan, Ohio, etc.
 
The economy is going to be the #1 issue in 2016.  Most people Michigan and Ohio aren't going to make immigration their main priority, especially since it doesn't directly impact their states.  While there are people who are going to hate this executive order, they are A). Already probably supporting the Republican and B). Don't need to be further motivated in order to get them out to the polls.

There are also people who will be directly benefited from this executive order.  While these people were already very likely to support the Democrat, they have very low voting rates so this motivation could be useful to Democrats.

I could see the Republican trying to tie Clinton to Obama using this issue.  This would hurt her most in states where Obama lost but Clinton could have more appeal with working class whites, like Missouri and Georgia.
Blue collar states don't like immigrants.

Have a Hispanic in-law and your opinion of Hispanics goes way up. But just as significantly, many 'illegal' Hispanic immigrants have 'legal' relatives.  Barack Obama just might have secured Colorado and Nevada for Hillary and put Arizona in play.

Voting behavior of working-class whites in recent elections suggest that they are almost as reactionary as Corporate America. They are superstitious, gullible, and angry -- and their anger will become favorable to Democrats only when a huge swing toward populism happens to a Democratic Party that looks more like Eisenhower-era Republicans than to Bryan-era Democrats. 

(It's now hard to distinguish the Republican Party from the John Birch Society).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.