NH-Sen: long Hassan wait
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 05:59:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  NH-Sen: long Hassan wait
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: NH-Sen: long Hassan wait  (Read 4427 times)
BM
BeccaM
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,261
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: November 29, 2014, 08:16:10 AM »

Ayotte is beatable, but shouldn't be underestimated either. I'd love to see such a vile creature lose, but from what I've seen she's a decent politician. But as others said, NH will remain as unpredictable as always.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,173
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: November 30, 2014, 07:08:15 PM »

Nah, New Hampshire is a reverse North Carolina in the making.

Ayotte is just waiting to be Haganed out.
Logged
free my dawg
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,142
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: November 30, 2014, 07:17:33 PM »
« Edited: November 30, 2014, 07:45:31 PM by Sawx, King in the North »

Ayotte is probably toast, move along.

Heh? Unless one of the top Dem candidates run (basically Hassan/Lynch/Kuster), this one starts at Likely R.

So despite the Democratic party actually having a decent foot in the door with a bench, and some decent proven candidates down the ballot, this race is on par with Kentucky or Georgia if Kuster doesn't run.

Of course it isn't. Kentucky and Georgia are Safe R. Neither will be lost short of some unforeseeable Akin-style meltdown.

Well considering Isakson is probably running again (and either way is a huge step above Perdue or Deal) I wouldn't doubt that. If it's an open seat it's Likely R, especially considering the influx of sh*t candidates the GAGOP has.

Lean R is more reasonable, but to put a state as volatile as NH as Likely R is foolish, especially despite weak candidates. Trust me - I thought when Scott Brown declared Shaheen would win by at least 5 points, not 2.
Logged
justfollowingtheelections
unempprof
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,766


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: December 01, 2014, 06:05:27 PM »

I suspect McLane-Kuster will run.
Logged
free my dawg
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,142
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: December 01, 2014, 06:33:45 PM »


As will I. She's got an obscene amount of CoH for her district - she's gotta spend it somewhere.
Logged
hurricanehink
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 610
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: December 04, 2014, 11:09:05 AM »
« Edited: December 04, 2014, 11:10:44 AM by hurricanehink »

The New England College Polling Institute has a poll out today that has Ayotte up 5 over Hassan, 48.1% to 42.5%, with 4.4% picking other and 5% undecided.

http://nhjournal.com/first-look-poll-shows-ayotte-with-small-lead-over-hassan-in-potential-2016-us-senate-matchup/
Logged
retromike22
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,452
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: December 04, 2014, 01:30:25 PM »

D+1! jk, decimals.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: December 04, 2014, 03:26:06 PM »

>Decimals
>New England College

Still, the dynamic of this race seems pretty obvious at the moment. If Hassan/Lynch run = toss up. If anyone else, it starts at lean R.
Logged
KCDem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,928


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: December 04, 2014, 03:30:50 PM »

>Decimals
>New England College

Still, the dynamic of this race seems pretty obvious at the moment. If Hassan/Lynch run = toss up. If anyone else, it starts at lean R.

The DSCC needs to do everything possible to get Hassan to run. The blue-state Republicans need to go.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,427
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: December 06, 2014, 06:16:05 PM »

Assuming Clinton assumes office in JAN 2017, and eventual loss in WVA, this is a plausible map should Begich opt to run in AK.


51-50 senate Hickenlooper breaks tie


Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: December 06, 2014, 06:20:36 PM »

Assuming Clinton assumes office in JAN 2017, and eventual loss in WVA, this is a plausible map should Begich opt to run in AK.


51-50 senate Hickenlooper breaks tie




That's a strange map, since Reid starts in a hole, there is no WV Senate election in 2016 and won't be (Manchin would only resign if he becomes Governor after the election), and Ayotte and Toomey both start unmistakably favored, and Kirk and Johnson both seem no worse than 50/50 right now.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,427
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: December 06, 2014, 06:24:11 PM »

Clinton does very well in NV and Manchin might retire in 2016, I said plausible.  But no doubt Hickenlooper will do very well for Clinton in NV and CO.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: December 06, 2014, 06:27:41 PM »

Assuming Clinton assumes office in JAN 2017, and eventual loss in WVA, this is a plausible map should Begich opt to run in AK.


51-50 senate Hickenlooper breaks tie




That's a strange map, since Reid starts in a hole, there is no WV Senate election in 2016 and won't be (Manchin would only resign if he becomes Governor after the election), and Ayotte and Toomey both start unmistakably favored, and Kirk and Johnson both seem no worse than 50/50 right now.

At this point in 2012, Landrieu was unmistakably favored and Pryor was no worse than 50/50.
Logged
henster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,984


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: December 06, 2014, 07:39:48 PM »

So Toomey won 51-49 in 2010 and will be running in a blue state in a Presidential year and he's favored? The race is definitely a tossup.
Logged
moderatevoter
ModerateVAVoter
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,381


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: December 06, 2014, 07:41:32 PM »

Also, OC, Begich would lose to Murkowski.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: December 06, 2014, 07:43:21 PM »

So Toomey won 51-49 in 2010 and will be running in a blue state in a Presidential year and he's favored? The race is definitely a tossup.

Oh, I didn't even notice that part. Now that Sestak has confirmed he's running, PA is unquestionably a toss up.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 11 queries.