On Knowledge vs. Confidence (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 09:47:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  On Knowledge vs. Confidence (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: On Knowledge vs. Confidence  (Read 1488 times)
Foucaulf
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,050
« on: November 19, 2014, 05:07:59 PM »

The word you're looking for is justified, as in "knowledge is justified true belief." The consensus is that justified true belief is at least a necessary condition for knowledge, though not sufficient.

There are many types of justification out there, I guess. But even the weakest justification can resolve your apparent paradoxes. Mary can propose "since when has Rebecca pulled a trick like that with the birthday party?" to get John to think differently. We know a red ball exists either by holding it and thinking that sensation of a round thing in our hand justifies the thought, or get someone else to confirm there's a red ball there, among other things. When your thought experiments seem counterintuitive, it's probably a sign that it isn't attacking something as fundamental as you may think.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.