In the following 2016 general election, what would you do ?

[Tender Branson]

"Option 6":

[Grumpier Than Thou]

Probably vote for either the Greens or some Socialist party.

[JRP1994]

Depends on which party controlled Congress.

• If Dems looked likely to take back Senate and House, I'd vote Bush.
• If GOP looked likely to hold both Senate and House, I'd vote Clinton.

• If Dems looked likely to take back Senate and GOP looked likely to hold the House, I'm not sure. I'd be "Leans Clinton", but Bush and Paul are currently the only two seriously considered contenders for whom I could be persuaded to vote.

[Mr. Illini]

I'd obviously vote for a Clinton over a Bush.

[The_Doctor]

Jeb Bush. I almost always vote for the Republican nominee.   

[Person Man]

Hillary. I think Jeb's presidency would look a lot like his brother's.

[New_Conservative]

Bush AINEC.

[retromike22]

Depends on which party controlled Congress.

• If Dems looked likely to take back Senate and House, I'd vote Bush.
• If GOP looked likely to hold both Senate and House, I'd vote Clinton.

• If Dems looked likely to take back Senate and GOP looked likely to hold the House, I'm not sure. I'd be "Leans Clinton", but Bush and Paul are currently the only two seriously considered contenders for whom I could be persuaded to vote.

A pro-gridlock voter?

[JRP1994]

Depends on which party controlled Congress.

• If Dems looked likely to take back Senate and House, I'd vote Bush.
• If GOP looked likely to hold both Senate and House, I'd vote Clinton.

• If Dems looked likely to take back Senate and GOP looked likely to hold the House, I'm not sure. I'd be "Leans Clinton", but Bush and Paul are currently the only two seriously considered contenders for whom I could be persuaded to vote.

A pro-gridlock voter?

Not so much pro-gridlock as pro-divided government. I believe that one party controlling the executive branch and both houses of the legislative branch is a recipe for abuse and corruption.

[5280]

Vote 3rd party.

[Mr. Smith]

Clinton.

[IceSpear]

Hillary of course.

[Maxwell]

Suicide or Gary Johnson.

[Yelnoc]

Jill Stein, I guess?

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

Gary Johnson, but if I am working within the GOP as an intern and the race is close, I might vote for Bush because I am a hack.

[Clarko95 📚💰📈]

Hillary.


I may not be sold on her yet, but Bush II and III just aren't for me. 

[Goldwater]

Bush

[SNJ1985]

Vote 3rd party.

This. I'm already planning on doing that regardless of who the Democratic and Republican nominees are (either that or I'll write someone in).

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

Bush

[Comrade Funk]

Depends what the leftist third parties trot out.

[retromike22]

Depends on which party controlled Congress.

• If Dems looked likely to take back Senate and House, I'd vote Bush.
• If GOP looked likely to hold both Senate and House, I'd vote Clinton.

• If Dems looked likely to take back Senate and GOP looked likely to hold the House, I'm not sure. I'd be "Leans Clinton", but Bush and Paul are currently the only two seriously considered contenders for whom I could be persuaded to vote.

A pro-gridlock voter?

Not so much pro-gridlock as pro-divided government. I believe that one party controlling the executive branch and both houses of the legislative branch is a recipe for abuse and corruption.

I would want one party to control everything, and so then if they become corrupt and/or ineffective, the voters can shift strongly to the ther party. Basically at this point I prefer a system where its easy to pass good and bad laws instead of a system where is difficult to pass bad and good laws.

[Kushahontas]

Vote 3rd party.

[Wake Me Up When The Hard Border Ends]

Depends on who runs on a third-party ticket, and who Bush picks as his running mate.

[TDAS04]

Clinton. 

[RR1997]

Bush