NH-Purple Strategies/Bloomberg/Saint Anselm: Romney/Clinton far ahead
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 02:37:43 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  NH-Purple Strategies/Bloomberg/Saint Anselm: Romney/Clinton far ahead
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NH-Purple Strategies/Bloomberg/Saint Anselm: Romney/Clinton far ahead  (Read 510 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 24, 2014, 07:22:47 AM »

With Romney:

30% Romney
11% Paul
  9% Christie
  8% Bush
  6% Carson
  5% Huckabee
  5% Ryan
  5% Cruz
  3% Jindal
  2% Perry
  1% Someone else
  3% None of these people
11% Undecided

Without Romney:

16% Christie
16% Paul
14% Bush
  9% Carson
  8% Huckabee
  7% Ryan
  5% Cruz
  4% Jindal
  3% Perry
  1% Someone else
  4% None of these people
13% Undecided

Dems:

62% Clinton
13% Warren
  6% Sanders
  5% Biden
  2% Patrick
  1% O'Malley
  2% None of these people
  8% Undecided

The Bloomberg Politics/St. Anselm New Hampshire poll was conducted Nov. 12-18 and surveyed a base sample of 500 likely 2016 general election voters with a margin of error of plus or minus 4.4 percentage points, as well as 407 likely Republican presidential primary voters and 404 likely Democratic presidential primary voters, each with a margin of error of plus or minus 4.4 percentage points.

http://www.businessweek.com/pdfs/bloomberg-saint-anselm-purple-NH-survey-Q1-to-Q9-11-2014.pdf
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 24, 2014, 07:26:51 AM »

Also:

Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 24, 2014, 11:42:39 AM »

Hillary Clinton will win New Hampshire -- primary and general.
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 24, 2014, 12:29:15 PM »

There must be 'insider' info spreading around that Romney is more likely to run that his public statements would suggest. Why else would he be included in these polls?
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 24, 2014, 02:08:02 PM »
« Edited: November 24, 2014, 02:13:29 PM by IceSpear »

#Hillaryunder70, RIP Hillary.

Gotta love that 88/9 favorability rating as well. Dems clearly are hungry for an alternative. Oh, and being the only one to break 50% favorability among the general electorate? SO POLARIZING AND UNPOPULAR!
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 24, 2014, 02:09:14 PM »

Good numbers for Ayotte - she is probably safe unless Hassan takes the plunge, and even then she should stand a good chance.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 24, 2014, 02:09:41 PM »

There must be 'insider' info spreading around that Romney is more likely to run that his public statements would suggest. Why else would he be included in these polls?

I think you're overthinking it. They also included Ryan for some reason even though his chances of running took a huge hit once he got the Ways and Means chairmanship.
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,059
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 24, 2014, 05:11:21 PM »

There must be 'insider' info spreading around that Romney is more likely to run that his public statements would suggest. Why else would he be included in these polls?

They include Romney, because he is the best known Republican of all potential 2016 candidates. It gives you a slightly more realistic picture than polling a 100% known Hillary against any 60-80% known Republican.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 12 queries.