TX Man Tries To Burn Down Mexican Consolate--Anti-Immigration motive suspected (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 05:02:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  TX Man Tries To Burn Down Mexican Consolate--Anti-Immigration motive suspected (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: TX Man Tries To Burn Down Mexican Consolate--Anti-Immigration motive suspected  (Read 2165 times)
Deus Naturae
Deus naturae
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,637
Croatia


« on: November 29, 2014, 11:26:15 PM »

Really, what is the "problem" with illegal immigration? If your issue is just with the fact that people are violating the law, just change the law so people have no incentive to violate it (ie, make it possible for anyone who wants to enter the US to do so). And before you bring up terrorists and the like, I'm not saying we should abolish all border checkpoint, just that we should allow anyone who wants to work to enter and become a citizen.
Logged
Deus Naturae
Deus naturae
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,637
Croatia


« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2014, 02:43:22 AM »
« Edited: November 30, 2014, 02:45:49 AM by Deus Naturae »

A critical insight that answers your previous question on how to do enforcement in an affordable manner. Start with the workplace.
Aside from the fact that E-Verify is simply inaccurate (as well as my civil libertarian concerns related to a National ID card), mandating that employers subject every new hire to an expensive and lengthy background check would increase labor costs significantly, which always has the effect of disemploying marginal workers - hurting the very low-skilled domestic workers you seek to help.

As for your claim that a liberalized immigration policy would lead to the unemployment and impoverishment of domestic workers who lack skills, if foreign workers are truly better at doing their jobs, it makes little sense to prevent them from doing so anymore than it makes sense to prohibit the use of labor-saving devices to ensure that manual laborers remain employed (not to mention it's fairly nativist to suggest that the economic wellbeing of domestic workers trumps that of foreign ones - not trying to accuse you of anything, just pointing out the logical implication of your argument). I'm not trying to dismiss the unemployment of poor natives as a non-issue, but surely there are better solutions for creating new jobs for them as opposed to imposing protectionist restrictions against immigrants who are simply better at doing their current jobs?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.