Protecting People from explosives Amendment (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 01:33:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Protecting People from explosives Amendment (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Protecting People from explosives Amendment (Passed)  (Read 3558 times)
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,275
United Kingdom


« on: November 29, 2014, 03:37:34 PM »
« edited: December 09, 2014, 08:46:23 AM by Senator bore »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor: Windjammer
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,275
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: December 01, 2014, 04:56:52 PM »

The major problem with the current passage is it's very plausible that it invalidates every single regulation on guns and low potency explosives,.
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,275
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2014, 05:51:40 PM »

Colin makes a good point, if people want to get child porn then there's really no stopping them.

Basically that our prevention won't work 100% of the time is no reason not to at least try.
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,275
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: December 04, 2014, 07:25:46 AM »

It's important to remember that most laws aren't aimed at stopping the completely determined- they're aimed at the much larger group of waverers, who might or might not do it.

For instance, in Britain a common method of suicide is taking a paracetamol overdose, and about ten years ago the british government reduced the maximum size of a paracetamol pack, and related deaths fell by about 40%, equivalent to about 765 lives.

If you really wanted to overdose on paracetamol you could still buy enough by going around different shops, stockpiling etc, or you could try a different method, but most people (thankfully) don't.
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,275
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: December 06, 2014, 08:38:16 AM »

There's been no debate for more than 36 hours and I can't see anywhere else this can go so I'm opening a final vote.

Senators, a final vote is now open on this amendment, please vote Aye, Nay or Abstain
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,275
United Kingdom


« Reply #5 on: December 06, 2014, 02:36:21 PM »

Aye
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,275
United Kingdom


« Reply #6 on: December 08, 2014, 04:08:19 PM »

This closes in about 14 hours JCL
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,275
United Kingdom


« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2014, 08:46:07 AM »

By a vote of 6-3 this amendment has passed and is sent to the regions for ratification:

Aye: Bore, Polnut, JCL, Windjammer, Bacon King, Cranberry

Nay: Yankee, TNF, Deus
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,275
United Kingdom


« Reply #8 on: December 10, 2014, 07:46:26 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Given a vote can only last 72 hours, and JCL's switching was after 72 hours had passed, the amendment has still passed.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 12 queries.