Civil Rights Act of 2014 (Passed)

[windjammer]

Proposing an amendment

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[/quote]

I think this clause would basically allow abortion during the third semester, and I obviously don't support late-term abortion.

[windjammer]

Aye,
Sorry, I don't support late term abortion

[windjammer]

Oh my god,
I'm sorry.

I withdraw my amendment if it is possible. I thought it deleted this part correctly, sorry, I was really tired

[windjammer]

Thank you Senator bore

[windjammer]

Really nice from your part Yankee .

[windjammer]

Aye

[windjammer]

Well,
Sorry for not having been active before, here are my thought:

Regarding Section 1, if I understand correctly, The so-called 'right' to 'self-determination' has been recognised by Atlasia since Wilson's 14 Points, so what's the point with that???

Then, the term "oppressed" is deeply flawed I guess. What do you mean by opressed?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Iin which way Arab Atlasians have been oppressed for example?
This list is highly questionable...

You must be logged in to read this quote.

This is definitely trash.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

This is unconstitutional.


Is this bill an attempt to end the current unity of Atlasia?

[windjammer]

No, now this is an amendment to the constitution,
So,
My amendment

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[windjammer]

And I second JCL's motion to table.

This bill, not only Section 1, is unconstitutional: the constitution with the right of free speech forbides any hate speech regulation, see Snowstalker vs the Midwest, or Scott vs the Northeast.

[windjammer]

Section 1 has been amended to be the status of a constitutional amendment. Perhaps if you were active like me you would pay b
etter attention...

Lol yes I saw that but that would have still been unconstitutional .
(and still a frivolous section)

[windjammer]

AYE

[windjammer]

AYE


By the way, bore, what about this?

And I second JCL's motion to table.

A third senator is needed.

[windjammer]

Nay

[windjammer]

Aye,

[windjammer]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Simply, there isn't a single way to know if the person is indeed homosexual or not. This isn't like race where we can identifythat by the colour of their skin, sexual identity is much more difficult to identify. Someone could claim he's gay in order to get a federal hiring for example.
And there are people as well who have a lot of difficulter to determine if they're gay, straight or bi.
That's why I believe this clause should be repealed.

[windjammer]

I object on the grounds that we should actively combat homophobia, cissexism, and heteronormativity.

This clause doesnt fight homophobia, it encourages fraud however.

[windjammer]

Aye

[windjammer]

Nay

[windjammer]

Aye

[windjammer]

So we're going to give reparations for things that happened 250 years ago???

[windjammer]

Aye

[windjammer]

Okay, here's something that addresses my first two concerns. I thought about adding the washrooms thing now, but I expect it'll be a bit more controversial, so maybe we should separate it from the easier stuff. If anyone wants to sponsor, go ahead. And if anyone thinks my ideas can be expressed in better language, make the change! But there ya go.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsored for you

[windjammer]

I prefer to abstain. I support most of the part of this bill (against sexual harassment,...) but considering I motioned to table the initial bill, voting Aye would be quite contradictory.

[windjammer]

Yes, with some reflexion, that's stupid:
AYE

[windjammer]

Daisy Duke? Is she the fiancee of Donald  Duke (Picsou, Riri, Fifi, Loulou,...). What's the problem with her? She seems to be respectable.