Racial divide on Ferguson indictment is almost identical to 2014 House vote
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 08:38:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Racial divide on Ferguson indictment is almost identical to 2014 House vote
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: Racial divide on Ferguson indictment is almost identical to 2014 House vote  (Read 6151 times)
GaussLaw
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,279
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: December 08, 2014, 09:20:34 PM »

Truth.  AggregateDemand is the cancer of southern blue avatars, making us respectable ones like me, Yankee, and Del Tachi look bad.

You guys believe that once you disperse the crowds, the circumstances that led to the rioting will also disappear. Truth is that some of you are dumber than the Democrats who support property destruction and violence against police as a means of demonstrating.

Blue avatar stands for competence, not propriety and piousness. You see all of these people wrecking their own towns and stealing as a means of acquiring modest amenities? They exist because you let the Donkeys run roughshod over the lower middle classes, and they persist because you're not willing to fix any problem that creates moral ambiguity or challenges your narrow interpretation of moral propriety. You're like a bunch of missionaries who worry about the damage to their reputation if someone sees them witnessing at a whore house.

The orange and green avatars know more about the depths of Democratic depravity than you clowns. They incorrectly identify it as neoliberalism, but at least they can see it.

Could you please clarify that using more simple language?  What do you mean by "moral ambiguity" and what have you actually proposed to help these people?
Logged
AggregateDemand
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,873
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: December 09, 2014, 02:22:49 AM »

Could you please clarify that using more simple language?  What do you mean by "moral ambiguity" and what have you actually proposed to help these people?

I'm talking about policy like EITC expansion that many pious conservatives won't put through because apparently they prefer to pay Welfare and then complain. Most Republicans couldn't care less about the state of inner-city schools and they don't push vouchers or charter schools. They also tolerate the educational cartel-power wielded by wealthy suburbs. Republicans generally scoff at Paul's proposal for aiming tax cuts at poor localities rather than upper-income tax brackets.

Civility towards Democrats, who often make the problem worse, does not make many Republicans respectable or tolerable. You simply refuse to get your hands dirty. 
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: December 12, 2014, 11:12:47 PM »

Could you please clarify that using more simple language?  What do you mean by "moral ambiguity" and what have you actually proposed to help these people?

Civility towards Democrats, who often make the problem worse, does not make many Republicans respectable or tolerable. You simply refuse to get your hands dirty. 

Yes, too much civility is clearly a cancer infecting modern political dialogue. Roll Eyes

Fortunately for you, no one has ever accused you of contributing to that 'problem'.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.