Nightmare Senate Scenario for Dems (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:36:09 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Nightmare Senate Scenario for Dems (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Nightmare Senate Scenario for Dems  (Read 5652 times)
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« on: December 07, 2014, 06:50:20 PM »

Frighteningly plausible. Hell, Toomey and Johnson could pull it out.

I'd like to see what a Johnson/Hillary Clinton voter looks like.

Maybe similar to a Gore/Santorum voter in 2000?

Exactly and Hillary, sadly, has more crossover appeal than Gore so a Johnson/Hillary voter isn't that bizarre of an idea.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #1 on: December 07, 2014, 10:26:25 PM »

Frighteningly plausible. Hell, Toomey and Johnson could pull it out.

I'd like to see what a Johnson/Hillary Clinton voter looks like.

Maybe similar to a Gore/Santorum voter in 2000?

Santorum was a populist and friendly with the unions.
Johnson is a hardcore tea-partier that has nothing to show during his first 4 years as a senator other that partisan attacks and gridlock.

He was friendly with some unions and not an overall populist at all. Rick says stuff about blue collar workers and is vocally socially conservative and the political nerd class goes into analytical overload by labeling him an economic leftist/BIG GUV REPUB!!! Yeah, he opposed NAFTA but look how he voted on other free trade agreements. Look at how the guy took on the mission of pushing Bush's partial privatization of Social Security (as a Sentor representing Pennsylvania).
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2014, 07:57:17 AM »


Look at how the guy took on the mission of pushing Bush's partial privatization of Social Security (as a Sentor representing Pennsylvania).

And look what happened to him two years later.

Right. What does that have to do with what we're discussing here though? Please stick to the topic or at least the point you tried to make.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2014, 11:10:28 PM »

And as usually Clintons do very well in FL

What does that even mean? Bill lost it in 1992 and won it by less than his national average in 1996. That's it.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #4 on: December 24, 2014, 11:29:42 PM »

Please don't engage known troll accounts.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.