How would past elections go if the electorates had foresight? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 12:28:32 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  How would past elections go if the electorates had foresight? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How would past elections go if the electorates had foresight?  (Read 2940 times)
dudeabides
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,375
Tuvalu
« on: December 09, 2014, 03:27:46 PM »
« edited: December 09, 2014, 03:37:14 PM by dudeabides »

I'll do 1960 - 2012:

1960:
John F. Kennedy (D) 51%
Richard Nixon (R) 48%
Explanation: Kennedy was a decisive leader and copied the GOP on tax cuts.


1964:
Barry Goldwater (R) 55%
Lyndon B. Johnson (D) 44%
Explanation: Vietnam.


1968:
Hubert Humphrey (D) 49%
Richard Nixon (R) 46%
George Wallace 4%
Explanation: Vietnam.


1972:
Richard Nixon (R) 57%
George McGovern (D) 42%
Explanation: Despite Watergate, McGovern was still too liberal for the country.


1976:
Gerald Ford (R) 60%
Jimmy Carter (D) 39%
Explanation: Despite Watergate, high inflation and unemployment plus a weak foreign policy are not popular.


1980:
Ronald Reagan (R) 64%
Jimmy Carter (D) 35%
Explanation: Carter's unpopular presidency, plus Reagan's popular one.


1984:
Ronald Reagan (R) 61%
Walter Mondale (D) 38%
Explanation: Despite Iran-Contra, Reagan's second term saw more economic growth and the end of the Cold War.


1988:
George Bush (R) 52%
Michael Dukakis (D) 47%
Explantation: Michael Dukakis ran a terrible campaign and was not a successful Governor, but the economy did see recession in the early 1990s.


1992:
Bill Clinton (D) 40%
George Bush (R) 36%
Ross Perot (I) 23%
Explantation: Washington became divided in 1993 and 1994, and having an independent as President would have been more popular than it was. Clinton still would have won, as people wanted a change.


1996:
Bill Clinton (D) 53%
Bob Dole (R) 42%
Ross Perot (Reform) 4%
Explanation: The great economic growth of Clinton's second term canceled out any anger towards his personal behavior.


2000:
George W. Bush (R) 53%
Al Gore (D) 46%
Explanation: George W. Bush's tax cuts led to the shortest recession in decades, his foreign policy and homeland security policies were popular during his first term, and Al Gore was a sore loser.


2004:
John Kerry (D) 51%
George W. Bush (R) 48%
Explanation: Iraq & the financial crisis


2008:
John McCain (R) 51%
Barack Obama (D) 48%
Explanation: Obamacare & the continuation and even deepening of the great recession. McCain would be at 53% or 55% had he picked a more popular running-mate.


2012:
Mitt Romney (R) 57%
Barack Obama (D) 42%
Explanation: Romney being proven right in foreign affairs, continuing economic woes, dysfunction in Washington, Obama's executive orders, and Obamacare.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.088 seconds with 11 queries.