Washington Post: Santorum is running in 2016 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 09:56:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Washington Post: Santorum is running in 2016 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Washington Post: Santorum is running in 2016  (Read 4681 times)
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« on: December 10, 2014, 12:43:33 AM »

As has been said, the SoCon crowd is full, and no Republican is really buying into his strange embrace of, well, Democratic economic policy.
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« Reply #1 on: December 10, 2014, 08:13:32 PM »

Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« Reply #2 on: December 11, 2014, 04:55:01 PM »

Godspeed, Rick.

I am very pleased that we have a wealth of options for the 2016 Presidential nomination. I'll take having that "problem" over having to choose between less than stellar candidates.

As for the "Republicans" here (and elsewhere) that would proudly vote for Hillary over Santorum, you seriously have no business being in the GOP. Please reconsider your party and where you think you lay on the political spectrum.

We're talking about the pro-union Santorum who just came out in support of Democrats' minimum wage hike, right?  Maybe he is the one who should reconsider.  He can take tax hiking, Medicaid expanding Huckabee with him too, if he wants.
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2014, 12:20:52 PM »

Godspeed, Rick.

I am very pleased that we have a wealth of options for the 2016 Presidential nomination. I'll take having that "problem" over having to choose between less than stellar candidates.

As for the "Republicans" here (and elsewhere) that would proudly vote for Hillary over Santorum, you seriously have no business being in the GOP. Please reconsider your party and where you think you lay on the political spectrum.

We're talking about the pro-union Santorum who just came out in support of Democrats' minimum wage hike, right?  Maybe he is the one who should reconsider.  He can take tax hiking, Medicaid expanding Huckabee with him too, if he wants.

What about you is the "Rockefeller" part of your GOPism?

He really really really likes Abraham Lincoln.

And gay people.

And abortions.

I think that's it.

Don't think gay people should be treated as second class citizens.*

Don't believe in forcing people who've been raped to have that child.*

Nice try.
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2014, 12:23:03 PM »

Godspeed, Rick.

I am very pleased that we have a wealth of options for the 2016 Presidential nomination. I'll take having that "problem" over having to choose between less than stellar candidates.

As for the "Republicans" here (and elsewhere) that would proudly vote for Hillary over Santorum, you seriously have no business being in the GOP. Please reconsider your party and where you think you lay on the political spectrum.

We're talking about the pro-union Santorum who just came out in support of Democrats' minimum wage hike, right?  Maybe he is the one who should reconsider.  He can take tax hiking, Medicaid expanding Huckabee with him too, if he wants.

What about you is the "Rockefeller" part of your GOPism?

Though I suspect you don't genuinely care, I'm pro-choice, pro-marriage equality, favor amnesty for undocumented workers, favor stricter environmental regulations and oppose voter ID laws.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 14 queries.