Is political violence inherently wrong? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 04:15:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Is political violence inherently wrong? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Wording deliberately vague
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 56

Author Topic: Is political violence inherently wrong?  (Read 1691 times)
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,263
Kiribati


« on: December 21, 2014, 11:11:09 AM »

The trouble with violence is it tends to increase the amount of disorder. Disorder leads to a power vacuums, which are far likelier to be filled by counter-revolutionaries, reactionaries, strongmen and other such nasties than anything remotely nice.

Look at state-sanctioned violence like, say, the Terror - despite having a "worthy" aim, it quickly spiralled beyond control and completely crippled the radical aspects of the revolution, allowing counter-revolutionaries to take over.

I'm not saying violence doesn't have its place. Some regimes and movements simply must be taken down under moral grounds. The Nazis. The Falangist rebelllion. The KKK. All of them are appropriate targets for violence, simply because they themselves have no respect for non-violent avenues of change. But violence should be approached with caution.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.