1912, No Roosevelt Candidacy
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 02:42:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  1912, No Roosevelt Candidacy
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1912, No Roosevelt Candidacy  (Read 3467 times)
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 21, 2014, 04:26:49 AM »
« edited: December 21, 2014, 03:38:21 PM by ElectionsGuy »



This is the map with all Roosevelt votes added into the Taft column. 50.6-41.8 victory in the popular vote and 379-152 in the electoral college. Is this plausible? I think that Taft definitely still would've won re-election in 1912, which would change the course of history, but by a much slimmer margin. Many Republican progressives would've stayed home, and I could see a ~5 point victory.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,071
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2014, 06:16:08 AM »

I actually think the Roosevelt vote would split almost evenly (maybe 60/40 Taft, but not much more), thus allowing Wilson to win. There was significant voter fatigue after 16 years of Republican rule.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 21, 2014, 09:05:49 AM »



This is the map with all Roosevelt votes added into the Taft column. 50.6-41.8 victory in the popular vote and 379-152 in the electoral college. Is this plausible? I think that Taft definitely still would've won re-election in 1912, which would change the course of history, but by a much slimmer margin. Many progressives would've stayed home, and I could see a ~5 point victory.

I disagree. While to a lesser extent, Wilson was also running on an outspoken Progressive platform.

Even without TR's candidacy, his dissapointment in Taft was well known and many of his supporters simply wouldn't stomach voting for the incumnent. At best, Taft would have won a narrow victory, nothing close to a comfortable lead.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,450
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 21, 2014, 09:32:36 AM »



NJ and WVA would have clearly switched sides and Wilson would have won a close election
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 21, 2014, 02:00:01 PM »



NJ and WVA would have clearly switched sides and Wilson would have won a close election

Vermont? Come on...
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 21, 2014, 08:15:56 PM »



NJ and WVA would have clearly switched sides and Wilson would have won a close election

NY votes to the right of VT in 1912?  I don't think so.
Logged
SWE
SomebodyWhoExists
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,300
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 21, 2014, 08:23:59 PM »

OC's analysis is spot on, as always
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 22, 2014, 01:10:31 AM »

VT voted for Taft over Roosevelt for a reason. It was a Republican state through and through. The reputation as a "liberal Republican state" is a mid-20th century development.

Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,680
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 22, 2014, 01:11:21 AM »

It would be fairly close, something like this:

287-244, with a decent chance of some combination of WV, WI, OH and/or NY giving a win to Wilson
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,704


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 22, 2014, 01:12:25 AM »

Taft wins narrowly. And of course he wins VT.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,663


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 22, 2014, 03:20:36 PM »



Taft 295
Wilson 236
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,450
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 24, 2014, 05:43:59 AM »



Would have loved for Wilson to win this map in 1912
Logged
nolesfan2011
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,411
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.68, S: -7.48

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 25, 2014, 09:21:07 PM »

I actually think the Roosevelt vote would split almost evenly (maybe 60/40 Taft, but not much more), thus allowing Wilson to win. There was significant voter fatigue after 16 years of Republican rule.

TR voters tended to lean Wilson as their second choice... so Wilson still is likely to win in this scenario, all be it by a smaller electoral vote margin than IRL. That said, no Taft otoh, and maybe Debs endorses TR (unlikely but still) and TR would have likely beaten Wilson everywhere but the old Confederacy
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 25, 2014, 11:55:55 PM »

I actually think the Roosevelt vote would split almost evenly (maybe 60/40 Taft, but not much more), thus allowing Wilson to win. There was significant voter fatigue after 16 years of Republican rule.

TR voters tended to lean Wilson as their second choice... so Wilson still is likely to win in this scenario, all be it by a smaller electoral vote margin than IRL. That said, no Taft otoh, and maybe Debs endorses TR (unlikely but still) and TR would have likely beaten Wilson everywhere but the old Confederacy

Are you simply guessing or citing some type of exit poll-preceding statistic?
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,450
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 27, 2014, 11:35:11 AM »

I reaffirmed the Wilson election victory, because it was coming off the heals of a 3 term G O P run.  Progressives were energized to come out and vote for Wilson, eventhough his ties to KKK. He still wanted Senate and tax and womens' vote reform. And FDR further enhanced his legacy through the United Nations and National Reserve Bank.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,680
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 27, 2014, 04:03:07 PM »

I reaffirmed the Wilson election victory, because it was coming off the heals of a 3 term G O P run.  Progressives were energized to come out and vote for Wilson, eventhough his ties to KKK. He still wanted Senate and tax and womens' vote reform. And FDR further enhanced his legacy through the United Nations and National Reserve Bank.

actually the Klan had long been dead in 1912, and was only reestablished in response to the film Birth of a Nation in 1915.
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 29, 2014, 10:44:40 PM »

Splitting Roosevelt's votes 80-20 (rather optimistic for Wilson, considering the strong correlation between Roosevelt votes and Taft-Hughes swing):

Logged
SWE
SomebodyWhoExists
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,300
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 29, 2014, 11:23:03 PM »

Can someone explain to me what the guy a few posts up has Wilson winning Vermont against Taft, even though Taft won even with the split? Is that an obvious troll I see?
OC's political analysis can often be a little special
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.043 seconds with 12 queries.