1912, No Roosevelt Candidacy (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 10:36:01 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  1912, No Roosevelt Candidacy (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1912, No Roosevelt Candidacy  (Read 3497 times)
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


« on: December 21, 2014, 09:05:49 AM »



This is the map with all Roosevelt votes added into the Taft column. 50.6-41.8 victory in the popular vote and 379-152 in the electoral college. Is this plausible? I think that Taft definitely still would've won re-election in 1912, which would change the course of history, but by a much slimmer margin. Many progressives would've stayed home, and I could see a ~5 point victory.

I disagree. While to a lesser extent, Wilson was also running on an outspoken Progressive platform.

Even without TR's candidacy, his dissapointment in Taft was well known and many of his supporters simply wouldn't stomach voting for the incumnent. At best, Taft would have won a narrow victory, nothing close to a comfortable lead.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2014, 02:00:01 PM »



NJ and WVA would have clearly switched sides and Wilson would have won a close election

Vermont? Come on...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.