The Seriously? Theatre of Absurdity, Ignorance, and Bad Posts V

[/]

Anyone who kills 100,000s of people by giving the clearance to drop two atomic bombs over hugely populated cities is not a liberal by my standards. That far, far worse than anything Hitler did by definition. The easier solution would have been to simply kill the Japanese emperor, yet that was a way too sophisticated idea for Truman at the time (probably he didn't have the mental capacity to come up with it either).

Hitler > Truman

i don't even

[ElectionsGuy]

one of the Republican Party's finest leaders.

[DavidB.]

No, they should not. In fact they should not celebrate it even once. Instead they should turn to truth of Christianity and leave the lies of Islam behind.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

No, I am pro-communist/pro-Marxist, because I favor the emancipation of mankind from the shackles of capitalist exploitation, religious dogma, etc, etc.

To those of you who say communism is dead and buried, I'd point you to the five states which are ruled by communist parties and which remain alive and well in the 21st Century, in spite of their bureaucratic deformations. One of those is the People's Republic of China, which in spite of market reforms still has its core industries under state ownership and utilizes economic planning to drive growth. It has performed fairly spectacularly over the past few decades and poses enough of a threat to the bourgeois powers that they've begun to engage in strategies to isolate it (Pivot to Asia, Transpacific Partnership, etc., etc.).

Likewise, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the Republic of Cuba, The Democratic Republic of Laos, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam all still stand today as testaments to the superiority of planned economies compared to the anarchy of the capitalist market system. In these countries, medical care, housing, and education are guaranteed and not dependent upon who your parents were, where you hail from, or what accent you speak with. In short, these countries have done what the capitalist system will never do, i.e. create a fully functioning welfare state that won't be rolled back the next time a right-wing (or 'left-wing' social democratic/eurocommunist) party is elected to government.

These countries suffer from bureaucratic deformities and unfortunately are run by Stalinist bureaucracies that deny their populations the right to fully participate in the planning of production and likewise have defects in that they promote stupid, parochial nationalisms as opposed to internationalist politics. But even so, they represent a massive advance compared to capitalist 'democracies' where the only freedom you are guaranteed is the 'freedom' to be a slave to some nonworking parasite.

Hopefully in the 21st Century we'll see political revolution in the states where capitalism has already been overthrown and the subsequent introduction of real workers' democracy there. And likewise, hopefully we'll also see new October Revolutions in the places where capitalism has yet to be overthrown.

[Penelope]

Likewise, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the Republic of Cuba, The Democratic Republic of Laos, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam all still stand today as testaments to the superiority of planned economies compared to the anarchy of the capitalist market system.

LOL. This can't be real. I never thought we'd actually have a DPRK apologist on the board. Now I've seen everything on here.

[politicus]

No, they should not. In fact they should not celebrate it even once. Instead they should turn to truth of Christianity and leave the lies of Islam behind.

Ironic coming from a poster called Unbiased.

[Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook]

I'm actually surprised that FF isn't getting more votes on this heavily-male forum.

Anyway, Cosby is a literal HP.

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

I'm actually surprised that FF isn't getting more votes on this heavily-male forum.

Anyway, Cosby is a literal HP.

hmm? atlas is exactly the kind of place that would defend bill cosby

[DavidB.]

If Rubio didn't have a Hispanic last name, no one would give a sh!t about him.

In a thread absolutely filled with bad posts, this one takes the cake.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

She deletes valuable threads she created once in a while she gets upset.

We lost a whole thread about Portugal due to her antics.

Please, Dave, remove her ability to delete her own thread or her abitily to create them, so it won't happen again.

Maybe she just had her period ... during which stuff like this happens.

()

[/]

She deletes valuable threads she created once in a while she gets upset.

We lost a whole thread about Portugal due to her antics.

Please, Dave, remove her ability to delete her own thread or her abitily to create them, so it won't happen again.

Maybe she just had her period ... during which stuff like this happens.

()

Surprised this one didn't make it here sooner.

[Gustaf]

She deletes valuable threads she created once in a while she gets upset.

We lost a whole thread about Portugal due to her antics.

Please, Dave, remove her ability to delete her own thread or her abitily to create them, so it won't happen again.

Maybe she just had her period ... during which stuff like this happens.

()

Surprised this one didn't make it here sooner.

Many may have Tender on ignore. I'm too exasperated to care about him anymore.

I also wanna add that the best part of that insane Eric post is the "by definition". By what definition??

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Rep. Anthony Brown or Martin O'Malley are the only ones who could defeat him. Brown because he's experienced at this now and O'Malley for campaigning skill and experience.

[Mr. Smith]

Family Guy only uses sexism to make fun of sexists. Peter says sexists things all the time but the point is he only does so because he is so f[inks]ing stupid and unprogressive.

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

The Democrats need to play hardball here and outright refuse to work with the Republican Party as they are unfit to govern. All Democratic Presidential candidates should be required to sign a pledge saying they will not invite any Republican Congressional leaders to the White House for the next 4 years, acknowledge any questions shouted by them during the State of the Union, make any eye contact with any of them in passing, and automatically veto anything they try to sponsor. It's time to really drill this issue to the forefront of the news cycle how truly incompetent and unworthy of anyone's respect these people are.

[Maxwell]

Rep. Anthony Brown or Martin O'Malley are the only ones who could defeat him. Brown because he's experienced at this now and O'Malley for campaigning skill and experience.

Everyone of his other predictions are just as bad.

[YaBoyNY]

Found my Hillary Clinton nutcracker cleaning out old room at Dad's house! I got as a gift during her first failed attempt at the Presidency.

Anyways, it's a matter of emotion vs. logic. Women seem to like the whole "guns are bad" and "have compassion" arguments of liberals. Men tend to be more analytical. "We need guns" and "if you break the law, f*** you, I have no compassion for ya!" Think of it as the Democrats being the Mommy Party and the Republicans being the Daddy Party.

Mommy knows you make mistakes, she'll enable it sometimes out of love and compassion. Dad don't take no crap, wants you to fix your own situation so that you'll be stronger on your own. Same thing here. Democrats will wipe your nose, Republicans will hand you tissues.

[Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook]

None of these men would be welcome in today's Democratic Party.

Foreign policy hawk and staunch free trader FDR would have supported Hillary in 2008, but then supported McCain in the general and joined the Tea Party in 2010. He would currently support Huckabee or Santorum, although they are to the left of him on some social issues.

Neo-Confederate Harry Truman was too much of a partisan hack to ever embrace the GOP, so he'd support Jim Webb. Needless to say, this endorsement would do nothing to boost Webb's numbers, and Truman would be shunned by Biden, Clinton or Sanders if he tried to endorse them down the road.

Staunch anti-Communist John Kennedy would be supporting a young, charismatic Catholic Senator by the name of Marco Rubio.

LBJ would have drifted away from the Democrats after 9/11 because of foreign policy, and would have likely endorsed Bush and spoken at the RNC in 2004. He would currently be supporting fellow Texan Ted Cruz.

[Mr. Smith]

Nixon managed to get a generation to hate protestors by calling them bums, and get people to believe in a secret plan to end the 'Nam War with no proof, while secretly doing the opposite.

Hillary can't even convince people that nothing happened just because she dared keep her regular email address.

Obviously Nixon's more charismatic here, but this is not a good thing.

Nixon also won against the 1972 Bernie Sanders prototype. I wish Nixon was alive and able to run next year.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

If anything, we should be encouraging Columbus Day.  It serves as a reminder of our nations founding.

Uh Columbus not only had nothing to do with the founding of the United States (nor did he ever set foot in any modern day US territory), but he predated the founding of the US by a greater time than the Declaration of Independence predates the present day.

It was founded long before the declaration of independence was signed

[The Last Northerner]

None of these men would be welcome in today's Democratic Party.

Foreign policy hawk and staunch free trader FDR would have supported Hillary in 2008, but then supported McCain in the general and joined the Tea Party in 2010. He would currently support Huckabee or Santorum, although they are to the left of him on some social issues.

Neo-Confederate Harry Truman was too much of a partisan hack to ever embrace the GOP, so he'd support Jim Webb. Needless to say, this endorsement would do nothing to boost Webb's numbers, and Truman would be shunned by Biden, Clinton or Sanders if he tried to endorse them down the road.

Staunch anti-Communist John Kennedy would be supporting a young, charismatic Catholic Senator by the name of Marco Rubio.

LBJ would have drifted away from the Democrats after 9/11 because of foreign policy, and would have likely endorsed Bush and spoken at the RNC in 2004. He would currently be supporting fellow Texan Ted Cruz.

This part would have been true though.

[/]

Too many good jokes are posted here.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Darthebearnc in this thread:

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=179472.425

[/]

Darthebearnc in this thread:

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=179472.425

Uhh, you spelled my name with a capital D. How offensive.

[Goldwater]

Ah, the joys of free speech...