I don't want anything champ. I don't particularly have a personal connection with things that happened 50 years ago. I merely deal with facts.
Many did. Southern suburbs did not. To them, Wallace was a low class demagogue who did not mesh with middle-class respectability. (Good old Strom was ok though)
Well, lol at that last one. But people weren't exactly flocking to the Wallace campaign because of his views on Medicare or whatever. North or South.
Of course, he was a good Southern boy. That was why they voted for him. This wasn't particularly indicative of any trends or demographic changes. To say this is a reason Wallace 1968 voters would have supported HHH is madness.
ok; organize this stuff into something relevant.
Of course. Nixon could not embrace Wallace because it would hurt him elsewhere. But to think that Nixon's strategy was to reach "racially-progressive" voters in Southern suburbs is pure insanity. If you disagree, please explain the policies Nixon advocated to reach these suburban racial progressives in the South.
Was it perhaps advocating busing? Housing? What policies?