Who will be the LEAST popular new governor?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 11:29:41 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Who will be the LEAST popular new governor?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Which of the new governors will become the least popular?
#1
Abbott
 
#2
Baker
 
#3
Ducey
 
#4
Hogan
 
#5
Hutchinson
 
#6
Ige
 
#7
Raimondo
 
#8
Rauner
 
#9
Ricketts
 
#10
Walker
 
#11
Wolf
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 112

Author Topic: Who will be the LEAST popular new governor?  (Read 9415 times)
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: January 01, 2015, 04:43:58 PM »

If Wolf is unpopular enough, he very likely won't even run again. If he's anywhere near Corbett levels, he definitely won't run again. I'm already very much a believer that Casey has a strong chance at being the nominee in 2018.

His seat is too precious. Too risky

The PA Dems don't have a bad bench. They could easily find someone to replace Casey.

Such as Schwartz?

She'd want to but she'd probably be too old by 2018.

Congressman-elect Boyle would surely run whenever there's an open seat. 2018 would almost be perfect for him.
Who do you think would be the strongest Republican Senate nominee for Pennsylvania in 2018?

We're still too far out to say. Luckily, we have a bench.
Logged
Vega
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,253
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: January 01, 2015, 05:14:42 PM »

If Wolf is unpopular enough, he very likely won't even run again. If he's anywhere near Corbett levels, he definitely won't run again. I'm already very much a believer that Casey has a strong chance at being the nominee in 2018.

His seat is too precious. Too risky

The PA Dems don't have a bad bench. They could easily find someone to replace Casey.

Such as Schwartz?

She'd want to but she'd probably be too old by 2018.

Congressman-elect Boyle would surely run whenever there's an open seat. 2018 would almost be perfect for him.
Who do you think would be the strongest Republican Senate nominee for Pennsylvania in 2018?

We're still too far out to say. Luckily, we have a bench.

And so do the Democrats, thankfully.
Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: January 02, 2015, 12:39:37 PM »

Rauner. He has opted to captain the Titantic Illinois as it moves inexorably towards the fiscal iceberg.
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: January 02, 2015, 12:42:34 PM »

For some reason I can't see Ducey being popular
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: January 02, 2015, 02:18:51 PM »


How is a moderate Republican who just got elected in a deep blue state and hasn't served a day in office "polarizing"?
Logged
free my dawg
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,145
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: January 02, 2015, 05:23:26 PM »

Rauner because Illinois.
Logged
Mister Mets
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,440
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: January 03, 2015, 01:08:22 AM »

I like Hogan, but he seems to be the best bet.

In the last 50 years, two other Republicans were elected Governor of Maryland. One lost reelection, and a comeback attempt. Spiro Agnew was brought down by a federal investigation for things he did in the two years he was Governor.

Others are vulnerable, too. Rauner's close, given Illinois, but he may be wealthy enough to avoid elements of corruption. Ricketts bombed first time he ran in Nebraska. Wolf has high expectations in a state that booted an incumbent. Walker has a low floor, as an independent reliant on voters from both parties. Raimondo doesn't have her party's base.

Logged
LeBron
LeBron FitzGerald
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,906
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: January 03, 2015, 04:51:19 AM »

Probably Rauner. He's set a new record in how fast it takes for an Illinois Governor to get hit with a corruption scandal, and he's destined for failure. He seems to me like a governor that's willing to abuse his veto power as well, and should that happen, that won't bode well for his approvals either.
Logged
Mr. Illini
liberty142
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,847
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: January 03, 2015, 12:42:05 PM »

Rauner because all the anti-Quinn Democrats who voted for him will realize he is a Republican.
Logged
Wake Me Up When The Hard Border Ends
Anton Kreitzer
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,167
Australia


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: 3.11

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: January 05, 2015, 03:16:20 AM »

Rauner, given that Illinois governors have a history of being absorbed into the corrupt IL state political machine.

The IL state political machine reminds me of New South Wales here in Australia, where the Labor government, who were incredibly corrupt, were defeated in a landslide back in 2011. With the term ending in March this year, a significant number of  members in the Liberal/National government, including the now ex-Premier, have now been caught out for corruption themselves.
Logged
dmmidmi
dmwestmi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,095
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: January 05, 2015, 01:28:40 PM »

Rauner, because nobody holding an elected office is ever popular in Illinois.
Logged
dmmidmi
dmwestmi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,095
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: January 08, 2015, 07:39:38 AM »

Rauner, because nobody holding an elected office is ever popular in Illinois.
Obama

Every rule has an exception.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: January 08, 2015, 07:27:30 PM »

Rauner, because nobody holding an elected office is ever popular in Illinois.
Obama

Every rule has an exception.

A better rule would be "Nobody who is governor of Illinois is ever popular". Both Durbin and Obama were in pretty good shape.
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,684
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: February 12, 2015, 02:04:05 PM »

Definetly Rauner. With his anti-union credentials, the Democrats will want to pick up this seat. It will be No. 1 in 2018 for the Democrats.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,888
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: February 13, 2015, 04:00:41 PM »

I feel like Rauner was elected because of Quinn's unpopularity rather than his positions, so him.

I agree. The same with Wolf, he was elected because Corby was very unpopular.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: February 16, 2015, 05:06:44 AM »

I feel like Rauner was elected because of Quinn's unpopularity rather than his positions, so him.

I agree. The same with Wolf, he was elected because Corby was very unpopular.

The odds are just a TAD different for a Republican running in IL vs. a Democrat running in PA.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 13 queries.