Efficient Referenda Amendment (Failed)

[bore]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[/quote]

Sponsored by: Windjammer

[windjammer]

It failed last year and I believe It s a good idea to let a highly competent member of this forum handle that.

[Cranberry]

I guess you want to strike the first paragraph here, and instead introduce the lower two paragraphs? Because this version of now makes no sense, the first paragraph says something completely different about the same thing as the other two paragraphs....

[windjammer]

I guess you want to strike the first paragraph here, and instead introduce the lower two paragraphs? Because this version of now makes no sense, the first paragraph says something completely different about the same thing as the other two paragraphs....

But I had just copied and pasted the deal that almost passed the senate last year??? (it went down 6-4)

[Cranberry]

I guess you want to strike the first paragraph here, and instead introduce the lower two paragraphs? Because this version of now makes no sense, the first paragraph says something completely different about the same thing as the other two paragraphs....

But I had just copied and pasted the deal that almost passed the senate last year??? (it went down 6-4)

Ah yeah, I just missed the "or", sorry from my side here.

[windjammer]

I guess you want to strike the first paragraph here, and instead introduce the lower two paragraphs? Because this version of now makes no sense, the first paragraph says something completely different about the same thing as the other two paragraphs....

But I had just copied and pasted the deal that almost passed the senate last year??? (it went down 6-4)

Ah yeah, I just missed the "or", sorry from my side here.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

First off a regional ratification vote is not a Federal Referendum.

Secondly, how does this "Certification process" work in the subsequent attempts at passage through say the IDS legislature? Is the SoFE going to be responsible for ensuring the proper implementation of regional Constitutions and statues establishing such subsequent attempts at ratification?

[windjammer]

I don t see the problem with the IDS?

[bore]

Proposing an amendment to address the IDS  concern:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[/quote]

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Does that resolve it by banning the legislature from doing it, or is this some kind of exemption of sorts?

[bore]

Senators have 36 hours to object to bore's amendment


That's intended as an exemption

[windjammer]

Amendment is friendly.

[bore]

Bore's amendment has passed


Are we ready for a final vote?

[Cranberry]

Yeah, I'm fine with it, and I'll be voting for this, it seems very sensible to me.

[windjammer]

I m ready!

[Lief 🗽]

Can someone just explain to me what the purpose of this is quickly?

[windjammer]

Can someone just explain to me what the purpose of this is quickly?

The constitutional amendment are currently admibistred by the governors: many problems happened because of that in the past.
With this amendement, it would be the responsibility of homely!

[bore]

Senators a final vote is now open on this amendment, please vote aye nay or abstain

[windjammer]

AYE

[Senator Cris]

Aye

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Abstain


I am still not ready to embrace this idea just yet. Though I am not as dead set against it as I was, I still think there is some rather unexplored usages of the present system that would certainly make things interesting. However, the present state is such that it would likely not work anyway and therefore losing such is not going to be a negative compared to the present status. Though I would have liked to see one regional election fought over a Governor refusing to open a booth as part of his discretion on a particular amendment he deemed hostile to said region. Basically, The PiT Approach, since he is the one who articulated that position the most.

[TNF]

Aye

[bore]

Aye

[Cranberry]

AYE

[Lief 🗽]

Aye