When will Tennessee become competitive?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 03:35:41 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  When will Tennessee become competitive?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3
Author Topic: When will Tennessee become competitive?  (Read 8564 times)
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 01, 2015, 09:14:45 PM »

With all this talk about Georgia or Arizona becoming competitive, why not Tennessee?

If the urban/rural split keeps expanding, shouldn't this help Democrats in Tennessee? Demographically, Tennessee isn't as rural as people think. It has 4 big cities - more than most states. Look what's happened in North Carolina.

Tennessee is certainly far more urban than Kentucky is.
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 01, 2015, 09:18:27 PM »

Well, other than in states like IL, NY, MD, etc., I feel suburban voters often provide the margin of victory.  And Nashville's suburbs (especially wealthy ones far away from the city) are very Republican.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 01, 2015, 09:29:14 PM »

Not any time soon.

Speaking of Tennessee, has anyone else noticed that Democrats tend to poll surprisingly well there early on, only for them to lose in a landslide in the end? Obama was in single digits of Romney in multiple polls in early 2012. There was also apparently speculation in 2004 that Kerry could possibly win the state, with some polls showing him within striking distance. And of course there's Gore's fail there, along with being the only competitive Senate race to not fall to the Dems in 2006.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 01, 2015, 10:30:21 PM »

This is like asking when will Maryland become competitive. It won't, it has moved farther and farther away from the Democrats in the past decade.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 01, 2015, 10:35:37 PM »

This is like asking when will Maryland become competitive. It won't, it has moved farther and farther away from the Democrats in the past decade.

Tennessee isn't getting any more rural. No state is.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 01, 2015, 10:46:39 PM »

This is like asking when will Maryland become competitive. It won't, it has moved farther and farther away from the Democrats in the past decade.

Tennessee isn't getting any more rural. No state is.

Yes, because more urbanization clearly means more Democratic vote. Good job at proving your point.
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,142
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 02, 2015, 01:01:40 AM »

Bandit, the 'urban' growth in TN is mostly suburbs. Think places like Southern Campbell County.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 02, 2015, 01:14:43 AM »

Bandit, the 'urban' growth in TN is mostly suburbs. Think places like Southern Campbell County.

I don't think most of southern Campbell County is officially classed as urban. The city of Alexandria is probably classed as urban, but that's about it.

What will happen eventually is something like Franklin County, Ohio, which had a Democratic swing of more than 40 points in 25 years.
Logged
Obama-Biden Democrat
Zyzz
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 02, 2015, 06:59:04 PM »

What possible demographic benefits Democrats in TN in the future ? There is no explosion of minorities or any large scale migration from the north. The population is stagnant and southern whites are extremely hostile to Democrats.
Logged
Obama-Biden Democrat
Zyzz
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 02, 2015, 07:03:21 PM »

Not any time soon.

Speaking of Tennessee, has anyone else noticed that Democrats tend to poll surprisingly well there early on, only for them to lose in a landslide in the end? Obama was in single digits of Romney in multiple polls in early 2012. There was also apparently speculation in 2004 that Kerry could possibly win the state, with some polls showing him within striking distance. And of course there's Gore's fail there, along with being the only competitive Senate race to not fall to the Dems in 2006.

LOL, that's so weird to think that TN was considered a vaguely swingish state. I vaguely remember in 2004, LA, WV , AK and TN being labelled as swing states. I guess as only 8 years before Clinton won them solidly in 1996. In 2000 , Gore lost them but was competitive.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 02, 2015, 08:14:00 PM »

Not any time soon.

Speaking of Tennessee, has anyone else noticed that Democrats tend to poll surprisingly well there early on, only for them to lose in a landslide in the end? Obama was in single digits of Romney in multiple polls in early 2012. There was also apparently speculation in 2004 that Kerry could possibly win the state, with some polls showing him within striking distance. And of course there's Gore's fail there, along with being the only competitive Senate race to not fall to the Dems in 2006.

LOL, that's so weird to think that TN was considered a vaguely swingish state. I vaguely remember in 2004, LA, WV , AK and TN being labelled as swing states. I guess as only 8 years before Clinton won them solidly in 1996. In 2000 , Gore lost them but was competitive.

The only reason TN was close in 2000 was because Gore was from there.

Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 02, 2015, 08:48:24 PM »

Maybe in a few decades, LOL. Even if urban areas are growing, is there state becoming more diverse? The increasing diversity in states like Virginia and North Carolina have transformed them from Republican-leaning states to swing states, and the same changes could eventually put Georgia in play. As far as I know, Tennessee is slightly whiter than America as a whole, and while there are a lot of AAs, the Hispanic population is quite small, and you don't see the same growth there that you see in states like Virginia. Since white Democrats in Tennessee have been trending increasingly Republican, the state has become out of reach for Democrats, and likely will be for some time.
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,531
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 02, 2015, 08:50:11 PM »
« Edited: January 02, 2015, 09:10:32 PM by TDAS04 »

South Carolina and Mississippi will become competitive before Tennessee is competitive again.  
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,188
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 02, 2015, 08:52:03 PM »

2006 had Corker win by a very slight margin, explain that.
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,531
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: January 02, 2015, 09:09:42 PM »

2006 had Corker win by a very slight margin, explain that.

2010 had Nikki Haley win by a very slight margin.  
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: January 03, 2015, 02:32:13 AM »

2006 had Corker win by a very slight margin, explain that.

Ford was the right type of right-wing Dem to get the DINOs (most of whom vote Republican now) to vote for him in Central Tennessee.
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: January 03, 2015, 01:18:13 PM »

It's kind of ignorant to live under this assumption that every growing state is on this inevitable march toward the Democratic Party.  Things will change over the next several decades.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: January 03, 2015, 01:27:24 PM »

It's kind of ignorant to live under this assumption that every growing state is on this inevitable march toward the Democratic Party.  Things will change over the next several decades.

Parties die when they get too extreme, and the Republicans are past their point. Eventually, Republicans will be outnumbered in every state, if you're talking about actual supporters. Republicans in government will hang on longer though.
Logged
Kraxner
Rookie
**
Posts: 179


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: January 03, 2015, 02:11:30 PM »

With all this talk about Georgia or Arizona becoming competitive, why not Tennessee?

If the urban/rural split keeps expanding, shouldn't this help Democrats in Tennessee? Demographically, Tennessee isn't as rural as people think. It has 4 big cities - more than most states. Look what's happened in North Carolina.

Tennessee is certainly far more urban than Kentucky is.





This is as delusional as hardcore liberals thinking a Sanders/Warren ticket will conjure a landslide just by screaming about the banks.
Logged
Mister Mets
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,440
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: January 03, 2015, 02:49:45 PM »

Probably when you have an incumbent Democrat with a very high approval rating running for reelection, or a piss-poor Republican candidate running in a poor environment (IE- If Republicans selected someone with much less political talent than McCain in '08).
Logged
Kraxner
Rookie
**
Posts: 179


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: January 03, 2015, 03:11:35 PM »

Probably when you have an incumbent Democrat with a very high approval rating running for reelection, or a piss-poor Republican candidate running in a poor environment (IE- If Republicans selected someone with much less political talent than McCain in '08).


Or if you manage to find a native son from the state on either the Prez or VP side of the ticket that fits the state's politics. Like Al Gore 1992/1996.

But even if its a Native son if they dont fit the politics their not going to win that state, ex: Al Gore 2000


So basically unless its a popular native son that fits the state's politics OR pending an ideological shift that returns the state to the democrat side at the expense of losing other states.

OR the ones you mentioned, Tennessee is not going to go dem anytime soon.
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,067
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: January 03, 2015, 03:23:20 PM »

When Hillary wins in 2016, obviously.
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,636
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: January 03, 2015, 05:31:06 PM »

muh urbanisation

More seriously though, it isn't having the minority influx like Georgia and Arizona. I suspect that Tennessee will remain Republican for quite a long time.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: January 03, 2015, 05:33:40 PM »

Remember also that younger voters are much more Democratic, regardless of race.
Logged
Obama-Biden Democrat
Zyzz
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: January 03, 2015, 06:06:06 PM »

It's also part of the Jacksonian upper south with AK, LA , MO, OK and WV. The increasingly urbane diverse socially Liberal democratic party (especially led by a black president ) is going to be a terrible fit for the region. Democratic losses are highly regionalized and steep in these areas.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 11 queries.