Tweed made a great point when he pointed out that any of the posts accusing opebo of being a pedophile would be deleted and heavily infracted if you replaced "opebo" in them with the name of any other member.
...how many other members do we have for whom there's reasonable grounds to suspect noncery?
You came here after dazzleman, but he actually made sexual comments about underage girls, and there was a mass outrage when someone called him a pedophile.
Also in regards to the advertisers not liking the links that were posted, let me pose the following scenario:
I demand that krazen be banned and state that if he isn't I'm going to post hardcore pornography on the forum. He isn't, so I start posting hardcore porn. The ad company finds out and sends a notice to Dave in regards to this, so to get me to stop krazen is banned.
Because the equivalent of that is basically what happened.
...how? Opebo was doing it himself.
No, it was Gully, not opebo, who was posting the problematic links in question.
Also in regards to the advertisers not liking the links that were posted, let me pose the following scenario:
I demand that krazen be banned and state that if he isn't I'm going to post hardcore pornography on the forum. He isn't, so I start posting hardcore porn. The ad company finds out and sends a notice to Dave in regards to this, so to get me to stop krazen is banned.
Well, your masterful plan would quickly crash with Nym dropping the hammer.
But Gully is still here and opebo isn't...