for Christians: when does the individual 'Fall into sin'?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 08:32:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  for Christians: when does the individual 'Fall into sin'?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: for Christians: when does the individual 'Fall into sin'?
#1
as part of the parents' sex act.  at conception
 
#2
at birth
 
#3
sometime after birth but in early childhood, after gaining elementary awareness of language, behaviors such as deception, anger, revenge, et
 
#4
sometime after early childhood
 
#5
other (explain)
 
#6
not a Christian
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 36

Author Topic: for Christians: when does the individual 'Fall into sin'?  (Read 8740 times)
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: February 08, 2015, 11:57:13 AM »

At the instant one comes into being, i.e. conception.
Logged
Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook
The Obamanation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: February 08, 2015, 11:35:27 PM »

Birth, of course.
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,172
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: February 16, 2015, 05:31:28 PM »
« Edited: February 16, 2015, 05:32:59 PM by Quadist »

Anyone who supports war for any reason is committing the worst SIN humans are capable of. What could be worse than murder or intentional killing which are really the same thing?

Why is it ok to break the commandment "Do not kill"? Why do so many Christians believe in only nine commandments, arrogantly omitting the most important one?

This kind of ignorance is an abomination.
Logged
Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook
The Obamanation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: February 16, 2015, 07:26:50 PM »

the commandment is not to murder. Murder and kill are not synonyms.
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,172
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: February 17, 2015, 09:33:32 AM »

the commandment is not to murder. Murder and kill are not synonyms.

There is no difference between the two. Either way the victim is dead. Both
involve intentional killing. Both are really the same. There is a difference
between unintentional killing and intentional killing. War involves intentional
killing. The genocide of millions of Jews by the Nazis was "legal". So if you're
going to split hairs between "legal" and "illegal" killing, that is the same
as saying that the killing of millions of Jews was not a sin because based
on the law it couldn't really be called murder.
Logged
Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook
The Obamanation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: February 18, 2015, 01:49:40 PM »

the commandment is not to murder. Murder and kill are not synonyms.

There is no difference between the two. Either way the victim is dead. Both
involve intentional killing. Both are really the same. There is a difference
between unintentional killing and intentional killing. War involves intentional
killing. The genocide of millions of Jews by the Nazis was "legal". So if you're
going to split hairs between "legal" and "illegal" killing, that is the same
as saying that the killing of millions of Jews was not a sin because based
on the law it couldn't really be called murder.

Um...No. By your standards then deaths caused in earthquakes and hurricains are murders.
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,172
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: February 18, 2015, 02:53:58 PM »

the commandment is not to murder. Murder and kill are not synonyms.

There is no difference between the two. Either way the victim is dead. Both
involve intentional killing. Both are really the same. There is a difference
between unintentional killing and intentional killing. War involves intentional
killing. The genocide of millions of Jews by the Nazis was "legal". So if you're
going to split hairs between "legal" and "illegal" killing, that is the same
as saying that the killing of millions of Jews was not a sin because based
on the law it couldn't really be called murder.

Um...No. By your standards then deaths caused in earthquakes and hurricains are murders.


How can they be classified as "intentional"?
Logged
Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook
The Obamanation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: February 19, 2015, 12:15:49 AM »

the commandment is not to murder. Murder and kill are not synonyms.

There is no difference between the two. Either way the victim is dead. Both
involve intentional killing. Both are really the same. There is a difference
between unintentional killing and intentional killing. War involves intentional
killing. The genocide of millions of Jews by the Nazis was "legal". So if you're
going to split hairs between "legal" and "illegal" killing, that is the same
as saying that the killing of millions of Jews was not a sin because based
on the law it couldn't really be called murder.

Um...No. By your standards then deaths caused in earthquakes and hurricains are murders.


How can they be classified as "intentional"?

If either way the victim is dead, then those deaths are murders, because there's no difference between kill and murder. At least that's how I read your post.

Even leaving aside nature, if someone dies in a car crash, is the other driver a murderer?

As for war, wars are killing, not murder, unless the victim is on the same side as the perpetrator.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: February 19, 2015, 12:20:30 AM »

the commandment is not to murder. Murder and kill are not synonyms.

"Thou Shalt Not Kill"...?

Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,172
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: February 19, 2015, 11:45:08 AM »


the commandment is not to murder. Murder and kill are not synonyms.

There is no difference between the two. Either way the victim is dead. Both
involve intentional killing. Both are really the same. There is a difference
between unintentional killing and intentional killing. War involves intentional
killing. The genocide of millions of Jews by the Nazis was "legal". So if you're
going to split hairs between "legal" and "illegal" killing, that is the same
as saying that the killing of millions of Jews was not a sin because based
on the law it couldn't really be called murder.

Um...No. By your standards then deaths caused in earthquakes and hurricains are murders.


How can they be classified as "intentional"?

If either way the victim is dead, then those deaths are murders, because there's no difference between kill and murder. At least that's how I read your post.

Even leaving aside nature, if someone dies in a car crash, is the other driver a murderer?

As for war, wars are killing, not murder, unless the victim is on the same side as the perpetrator.

I said "intentional" killing. The point is that "Just War" is an oxymoron.
If it wrong to kill people, there are no exceptions. As for car accidents. The point is that they are accidents, which means that they are not intentional. I do not call myself a "Christian", but I would point out that Jesus never killed anyone. He was a pacifist, which is a good thing.
Logged
compson III
sutpen
Rookie
**
Posts: 63
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: February 21, 2015, 12:21:49 PM »

All human life does bad things, whether you want to call it sin or not.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanishing_twin
http://www.ulm.edu/~palmer/Mother.htm

Still, there are more disturbing things that happen in other parts of the animal kingdom.  And doesn't it make sense to attribute more sin to the male gorilla who cannibalizes his newly won harem's children who were fathered by another male?  Surely the gorilla has ethical responsibility.  He experiences a "face to face" encounter ala Levinas (though I admit not being deeply read in Levinas).  Yet we only ascribe "original sin" as a human phenomenon. 

I think this means we should take a gradualist approach.  But I'm still not sure.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 14 queries.