It's clearly rather the misogynist crowd which is sexually frustrated - hence the fantasies of exploiting vulnerable women and the glorification of someone who manages the amazing feat of paying for sex.
I think those of us who have sex regularly find it less impressive to buy a hooker than the permavirgins seem to do.
I bet I've had more (normal) sex than you.
And the race is on...
It's really not about having a pissing match, at least for me. It's more about how a certain poster has a chronic habit of telling - no, lecturing - entire chunks of the forum about how much sex he has had, how regularly he must be having it, how fantastically positive he treats all of these remarkably lucky ladies before, during and after it and how positively normal his sex life is compared to the poor, poor deprived and/or deranged masses here at the Atlas Forum. Not only does this card get played whenever he "confronts" those with whom he disagrees on certain posters, but it also gets presented whenever - lo and behold - accusations of sexism manifest.
Unfortunately in the former situation, he fails to realize that supporters of certain posters never decided whether to like nor dislike a particular person they've never met based on their sexual escapades (likely because it was a red meat personal attack/talking point designed by his broader clique to flip the "swing voters", if you will), and unfortunately in the latter situation, he fails to realize that talking about how many women you bang, how often you do so and how great you treat them in a discussion about sexism makes one a sexist. Just who here is the object of convincing?
In short, I posted it not because I genuinely believe he is actually experiencing this and rubbing it other faces nor because I want to have the aforementioned pissing match, but rather, I posted it because I believe it is all nothing more than a steaming crock of bullsh!t.
You do realize that Gustaf does that
in response to the people who crow about how "oh noes if you say anything vaguely feminist that means you must be a prude and a virgin!!!11!lol". The point is not to brag, it's to point out a ludicrously strawmannish lie for what it is. I'm sure that if the "anti-pruders" had a shred of intellectual honesty, he wouldn't feel the need to engage in that particular bit of rhetoric.
Turning the situation around as you do here is, pardon my French, the
real steaming crock in this room.
Poll
