NORTHEAST DEBATE: Tort Reform
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 05:09:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  NORTHEAST DEBATE: Tort Reform
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NORTHEAST DEBATE: Tort Reform  (Read 1402 times)
YRABNNRM
YoungRepub
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,680
United States
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 21, 2005, 06:16:42 PM »
« edited: April 28, 2005, 06:22:28 PM by Governor Andrew »

Assembly member Emsworth of New Jersey has proposed the following bill to the Northeast Assembly...


Tort Reform
[/b]
Written by Emsworth
Section 4 by ColinW
§ I. Cap on Punitive Damages
No court shall award punitive damages exceeding $500,000 in any civil case.

§ II. Applicability
Section I shall not retroactively apply to any actions committed prior to this Act's passage.

§ III. Compensatory Damages
The provisions of this act shall not be construed to limit the award of compensatory damages.

§ IV. The loser of the said lawsuit is hereby required to pay the legal fees of the winning party up to a reasonable maximum.
                 A. A reasonable maximum shall be defined to be $750,000.
                 B. This reasonable maximum may be changed at any time by the Northeast Assembly.


Debate will last about a week, the same as in the past.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2005, 06:21:04 PM »

Mr. Governor,

I would like to thank you for opening debate on this issue. Recapitulating on a post I have made in another thread, I would not oppose an amendment that would set different caps for different offenses.
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2005, 12:26:36 PM »

I would like to see some sort of loser pays provision in this Tort Reform bill. I will try and make an amendment when I get home today.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 23, 2005, 06:41:28 AM »

[Bump.]
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 23, 2005, 09:46:41 AM »

I have an amendment to propose.

Section 4. The loser of the said lawsuit is hereby required to pay the legal fees of the winning party up to a reasonable maximum.
                 A. A reasonable maximum shall be defined to be $750,000.
                 B. This reasonable maximum may be changed at any time by the Northeast Assembly.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 23, 2005, 10:05:27 AM »

I have an amendment to propose.

Section 4. The loser of the said lawsuit is hereby required to pay the legal fees of the winning party up to a reasonable maximum.
                 A. A reasonable maximum shall be defined to be $750,000.
                 B. This reasonable maximum may be changed at any time by the Northeast Assembly.
Although I feel that $750K may be a little high, I am in favor of the amendment in principle.
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 23, 2005, 10:27:54 AM »

I have an amendment to propose.

Section 4. The loser of the said lawsuit is hereby required to pay the legal fees of the winning party up to a reasonable maximum.
                 A. A reasonable maximum shall be defined to be $750,000.
                 B. This reasonable maximum may be changed at any time by the Northeast Assembly.
Although I feel that $750K may be a little high, I am in favor of the amendment in principle.

Well lawyer fees themselves are very high. I've heard that some lawyers get paid upwards $450 an hour and if a case goes on for a normal period of time then it could easily get up to $750,000. Also we are trying to prevent frivolous lawsuits and when a person sees that they could be paying over $700,000 will dissuade them unless they really think that their case is good enough to actually either get a settlement or win.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 24, 2005, 02:31:26 PM »

I have an amendment to propose.

Section 4. The loser of the said lawsuit is hereby required to pay the legal fees of the winning party up to a reasonable maximum.
                 A. A reasonable maximum shall be defined to be $750,000.
                 B. This reasonable maximum may be changed at any time by the Northeast Assembly.
Although I feel that $750K may be a little high, I am in favor of the amendment in principle.

Well lawyer fees themselves are very high. I've heard that some lawyers get paid upwards $450 an hour and if a case goes on for a normal period of time then it could easily get up to $750,000. Also we are trying to prevent frivolous lawsuits and when a person sees that they could be paying over $700,000 will dissuade them unless they really think that their case is good enough to actually either get a settlement or win.
In that case, I support the amendment.
Logged
YRABNNRM
YoungRepub
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,680
United States
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 24, 2005, 02:47:53 PM »

If it is ok with everyone I will open vote on the ammendment sometime tonight.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 24, 2005, 02:51:47 PM »

I have a procedural question for the Governor: is it necessary to hold a vote on the amendment? Since no-one has objected to it yet, it might be appropriate for the amendment to be deemed passed by unanimous consent. Then, we could simply proceed directly to the vote on the bill.

Of course, if this suggestion contravenes either the Constitution or the past practice of the region, I withdraw it.
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 24, 2005, 03:27:37 PM »

I have a procedural question for the Governor: is it necessary to hold a vote on the amendment? Since no-one has objected to it yet, it might be appropriate for the amendment to be deemed passed by unanimous consent. Then, we could simply proceed directly to the vote on the bill.

Of course, if this suggestion contravenes either the Constitution or the past practice of the region, I withdraw it.

No its usual procedure to vote on any amendments even if their has been no objection.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 25, 2005, 03:20:39 PM »

No its usual procedure to vote on any amendments even if their has been no objection.
Oh, I see. In that case, I look forward to the vote.
Logged
YRABNNRM
YoungRepub
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,680
United States
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 25, 2005, 04:08:55 PM »

I apologize for not opening the vote last night, it slipped my mind. I will hearby open vote on the ColinW Amendment immediatly. Voting will last until 5 PM eastern time Tuesday the 26th.

PLEASE VOTE AYE OR NAY ON THE COLINW AMENDMENT
Logged
KEmperor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,454
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -0.05

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 25, 2005, 04:10:42 PM »

I vote AYE on the ColinW amendment.
Logged
YRABNNRM
YoungRepub
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,680
United States
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 25, 2005, 05:28:29 PM »

Aye
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: April 25, 2005, 05:59:25 PM »

Aye
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: April 25, 2005, 06:55:29 PM »

Aye.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: April 26, 2005, 05:48:21 AM »

[Bump.]
Logged
YRABNNRM
YoungRepub
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,680
United States
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: April 26, 2005, 09:08:16 PM »

Voting on the amendment ended about 5 hours ago. May the debate proceed.
Logged
YRABNNRM
YoungRepub
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,680
United States
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: April 28, 2005, 12:32:06 PM »

I would like to open the vote on this tonight if thats alright with everyone.
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: April 28, 2005, 02:43:01 PM »

I would like to open the vote on this tonight if thats alright with everyone.

Fine by me.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: April 28, 2005, 03:22:10 PM »

I would like to open the vote on this tonight if thats alright with everyone.
Fine by me.
Same here.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 11 queries.