Windjammer vs Speaker bore

[windjammer]

I'm filing a lawsuit against Speaker bore.

By a vote of 6-0-1 this amendment has passed the senate and is sent to the regions for ratification

Aye: Bore, Cranberry, TNF, Lief, Cris, Windjammer,

Abstain: Yankee

Not Voting: Polnut, Bacon King, SWE

Speaker bore certified this constitutional as having passed the senate. However, according to the constitution (Article VII Section 1 clause 1):

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Right now, there are 10 senators, so it needed 7 Ayes in order to pass. It didn't (only 6), that's why I believe Speaker bore was wrong when he certified this amendment passed the senator, because it failed.

Best regards,
Senator Windjammer

[windjammer]

Have you contacted the Speaker about this? Unless he were to contest your interpretation this doesn't seem like a matter best resolved by the Court.

He contests Associate Justice oakvale

[windjammer]

Why must you keep suing, windjammer?

Because the constitution must be respected.

[windjammer]

Hey so I voted in favor of it making this moot

After the deadline.

[windjammer]

Hey so I voted in favor of it making this moot

After the deadline.

Aw, I thought I could help

Just to be clear, I don't reproach Bore anything, I believe he's doing a good job as Speaker, I just believe his interpretation on this matter is wrong. I understand that this is a matter that can be interpreted by different ways and I will respect the decision of the court whatever it is.

[windjammer]

I would appreciate that this could have been handled in a better fashion. Namely, contacting Senator Bore directly, rather than running to the Court.

I contacted bore directly about that before suing him, bore can confirm.