ATFFL
Junior Chimp
Posts: 5,754
|
 |
« on: April 22, 2005, 12:25:44 AM » |
|
These answers are for Federal District Court only. I will probably comment on a few people that I would be willing to put at different levels as well. I am also assuming that this is after some training in the law for these people.
1-Philip - Yes, but not for an appelate level position.
2-BRTD - No. Has shown he would gladly ignore the law in favor he personally supports and would ignore laws allowing things he does not. Seems to be maturing out of this world view. Get back to me in 6 months and it may be a yes, though his blind partisanship at times might keep him in the No area.
3-John Dibble - Yes, for any level
4-opebo - Yeah, right. No way.
5-Lunar - Yes
6-jfern - No.
7-bandit - No
8-Flyers - No
9-Keystone Phil No
10-StatesRights No. Not of a judicial mindset to me.
11-Jake - No
12-Al - Yes.
13-migrendel - no
14-nclib - Maybe. I imagine a lot of rulings saying "I urge Congress to take up this issue" but very little ligislating from the bench. Could convince me in a hearing to support him
15-nickshepDEM - Yeah
16-Sam Spade - Yep
17-Harry - Yes
18-Ebowed - Yes, at any level
19-John Ford - Yes, at any level
20-John Engle - Nope
21-WMS - Yes
22-Lewis Trondheim - Yes, but could lose me in a hearing
23-KEmperor - Yes
24-Bob - Yes, at any level
25-angus - No
26-Nym - Yes
27-Ernest - Toss up. Would decide in hearing
28-Peter Bell - Yep
29-Mike Naso - No
30-phknrocket1k - No
|
