Revising my list as it's been three months.
1-Philip - Still No, Extreme interpretation of the Constitution on many issues.
2-BRTD - Too willing to support his beliefs over the law. 9th Circuit here we come.
3-John Dibble - Yes, though he may lose me in a hearing.
4-opebo - No. Anyone who supports child molestation and genocide based on religious grounds is not judicial material
5-Lunar - Yes, a good mixture of ideology and pragmatism
6-jfern - No, another partisan hack who'd be perfect for the 9th Circuit Court.
7-bandit - See JFraud and BRTD
8-Flyers - No, extreme abortion positions even for a pro-choicer
9-Keystone Phil - Yes, good temperment. Better suited as a prosecutor.
10-StatesRights - Possibly, a bit extreme on some issues.
11-Jake - This Nazi?
12-Al - Yes, the most suited of anyone to be a judge.
13-migrendel - No, intelligent, but lost me with his defense of infanticide.
14-nclib - No, feminist bitch and resident terrorist sympathizer.
15-nickshepDEM - Yes, another person who'd make a fine judge.
16-Sam Spade - Yes, Sam has shown himself to be an intelligent and pragmatic person.
17-Harry - Yes, a fine person. Better suited as a legislator though.
18-Ebowed - Possibly, excellent ideology, but better fit for a legislative position.
19-John Ford - Yes, another person who'd make a fine judge.
20-John Engle - Can he read?
21-WMS - Yes, perfect judicial temperment.
22-Lewis Trondheim - No, too extreme at times.
23-KEmperor - No, I'd reject him for ideology and attitide.
24-Bob - No, ideological to the extreme.
25-angus - Yes
26-Nym - Yes, doesn't seem like the activist type.
27-Ernest - Yes, for intelligence alone.
28-Peter Bell - Yes, though he is another who'd be willing to use belief over law at times.
29-Mike Naso - Maybe as arbitrator for the Stow Youth Soccer League.
30-phknrocket1k - No, extreme and ideological. Activist Judge
