Should Facebook allow photos of women breastfeeding?

[nclib]

Absolutely.

Facebook is finally allowing this.

It is outrageous how endless violence is accepted, but a bare nipple is so controversial.

[Maxwell]

Does facebook allow violence?

[nclib]

The link that I posted seems to indicate that.

[NewYorkExpress]

Yes, and they should limited violence. I'm not sure anyone really wants to see a Facebook page with photos of corpses as the only thing on it.

[Goldwater]

Really, I don't think Facebook should place any limits on what's posted.

[Small Business Owner of Any Repute]

Yes, and they should limited violence. I'm not sure anyone really wants to see a Facebook page with photos of corpses as the only thing on it.

When was the last time you accidentally wound up on a page like that?

[politicus]

I don't think Facebook should place any limits on what's posted.

[NewYorkExpress]

Yes, and they should limited violence. I'm not sure anyone really wants to see a Facebook page with photos of corpses as the only thing on it.

When was the last time you accidentally wound up on a page like that?

You have to check out every friend request... who knows, twenty years you might be married to someone you met on Facebook.

[justfollowingtheelections]

First world problems.

[checkers]

Yes (of course). What's showing violence got to do with anything?

[Maxwell]

Yes (of course). What's showing violence got to do with anything?

well, i mean, what's love got to do with it?

[Grumpier Than Uncle Joe]

Of course (normal)  I'm not into "no limits" since it's a private website, but yeah, let's not nanny state it either.

[Goldwater]

Of course (normal)  I'm not into "no limits" since it's a private website, but yeah, let's not nanny state it either.

Of course, being a private website, they should obviously be allowed to limit what's posted. I'm just saying that if I was in charge of their policies I wouldn't.

[Grumpier Than Uncle Joe]

Of course (normal)  I'm not into "no limits" since it's a private website, but yeah, let's not nanny state it either.

Of course, being a private website, they should obviously be allowed to limit what's posted. I'm just saying that if I was in charge of their policies I wouldn't.

Given the demographic of their users I think you have to have some limit, but certainly not breastfeeding.  Some guy chopping up his gf on a facebook video is kind of where my mind is on this subject.

[Gustaf]

Yes (not a prude )

[Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck]

I approve of anything that makes boobs more available for sight, whether or not portrayed in a sexual manner.  Women should also feel free to post as many videos of breast self-exams as possible, so their technique can be reviewed and critiqued for effectiveness.  Lives will be saved. 

[Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook]

First world problems.

Not really, people all over the world are on the site, including 3rd world countries.

[Lief 🗽]

Both women and men should be able to post topless pictures of themselves on Facebook.

[Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck]

I'm glad to see Atlas is unanimous on this one sans oakvale, Gully, and Bushie (opposes porn). 

[TDAS04]

Yes.

[nclib]

Yes (of course). What's showing violence got to do with anything?

I find it very undesirable that we sooner censor a natural act where no one is a victim, because it shows *gasp* a bare breast/nipple, than graphic violence and language condoning rape (such as a group called 'Riding your girlfriend softly because you don't want to wake her up').

The standards in the media are not even close--a very extreme level of violence draws a lower rating than brief sexuality. Even if we accept that seeing sexuality/nudity may make a child more likely to experiment sexually, assuming it is consensual, that is still better than violence.

[checkers]

Yes (of course). What's showing violence got to do with anything?

I find it very undesirable that we sooner censor a natural act where no one is a victim, because it shows *gasp* a bare breast/nipple, than graphic violence and language condoning rape (such as a group called 'Riding your girlfriend softly because you don't want to wake her up').

The standards in the media are not even close--a very extreme level of violence draws a lower rating than brief sexuality. Even if we accept that seeing sexuality/nudity may make a child more likely to experiment sexually, assuming it is consensual, that is still better than violence.

Oh, I completely agree with you. I just asked that because I missed your initial comment and I was wondering why people were asking about whether facebook showed violence - I assumed they were implying that showing breastfeeding was only okay if violence could be shown and I wanted to suggest that that wasn't a legitimate comparison.