Public non binding consultations Amendment (Failed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 07:16:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Public non binding consultations Amendment (Failed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Public non binding consultations Amendment (Failed)  (Read 2824 times)
Senator Cris
Cris
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,613
Italy


« on: January 23, 2015, 02:24:26 PM »

I thank the Speaker for putting this on the floor.

The Senators are elected by the people and I think that on the most important issues (bicameralism or consolidation, for example), the people should indicate to us the way to follow.
This is a public non binding consultation. Not binding, but the Senate should morally be obliged to follow the results of that federal consultation.

I think that this is a good proposal, and I'm opening to all thoughts of the Senators.

Also... Now I noticed that there is an error in the point 5) on "the passage of the proposal" and it should be modified in order to have the Speaker informing the SoFE of the achievement of 4 Senators. I'll present an amendment on this in the next days.
Logged
Senator Cris
Cris
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,613
Italy


« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2015, 08:29:52 AM »

Do you think that binding consultations are better?
Logged
Senator Cris
Cris
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,613
Italy


« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2015, 04:42:24 PM »

My amendment:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Senator Cris
Cris
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,613
Italy


« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2015, 04:21:46 PM »
« Edited: January 29, 2015, 04:28:22 PM by Senator Cris »

On thorny issues (bicameralism and consolidation now, for example), the Senate, first to legislate, should listen what the people want. The Senate is not obliged to follow the results of consultations, but it should be morally obliged.
But if you think that a binding consultation is better, I'm open to this change! Smiley
Logged
Senator Cris
Cris
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,613
Italy


« Reply #4 on: January 30, 2015, 08:17:36 AM »

Why are you guys trying to legislate for what's currently accomplished by someone simply making a poll?
Poll = 20/30 voters.
Consultation = more than 30 voters.
Logged
Senator Cris
Cris
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,613
Italy


« Reply #5 on: January 30, 2015, 02:59:48 PM »

Motion to table and save us all a lot of time.
The same argument can be made for many of your proposals.



I object.
Logged
Senator Cris
Cris
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,613
Italy


« Reply #6 on: February 02, 2015, 02:19:53 AM »

I object.
Logged
Senator Cris
Cris
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,613
Italy


« Reply #7 on: February 03, 2015, 12:03:37 PM »

As said in the past, if you want, I'm open to public binding consultations.
Logged
Senator Cris
Cris
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,613
Italy


« Reply #8 on: February 03, 2015, 12:15:38 PM »

As I already said, I will support this law. Do you want us to still debate this amendment or can I motion for a final vote Cris?

I think of yes, Windjammer.
I pointed out three times my support for an amendment for binding consultations, but considered that no Senators have responded, and that I'm ok with the amendment as it stands, I'm ready for a final vote.
Logged
Senator Cris
Cris
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,613
Italy


« Reply #9 on: February 04, 2015, 03:51:17 PM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 12 queries.