Republican Iowa dropouts
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 11:12:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Republican Iowa dropouts
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which Republican candidate will be most likely to drop out after Iowa?
#1
Mitt Romney
 
#2
Jeb Bush
 
#3
Rick Perry
 
#4
Rand Paul
 
#5
Marco Rubio
 
#6
Rick Santorum
 
#7
Mike Huckabee
 
#8
Bobby Jindal
 
#9
Scott Walker
 
#10
Chris Christie
 
#11
Ted Cruz
 
#12
Jim Gilmore
 
#13
Lindsey Graham
 
#14
Sarah Palin
 
#15
Carly Fiorina
 
#16
Michele Bachmann
 
#17
Peter King
 
#18
Ben Carson
 
#19
Donald Trump
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 41

Author Topic: Republican Iowa dropouts  (Read 1588 times)
OldDominion
Rookie
**
Posts: 50
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 25, 2015, 04:48:13 PM »

Per the title, which Republican candidate will be most likely to drop out after Iowa? Why? Lack of momentum, slowing funds, scandal, running for the PR? You decide.

Included as many as possible without the perennials. Fundies and potential non-starters toward the  bottom of the list to make it easier.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 25, 2015, 04:49:11 PM »

Rick Perry
Logged
Vega
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,253
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 25, 2015, 04:58:53 PM »

I didn't know he was even considering running but definitely Jim Gilmore.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 25, 2015, 05:21:22 PM »

Probably multiple people, but of these, losing Iowa would kill Huckabee's chances the most.
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,764
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 25, 2015, 05:41:53 PM »
« Edited: January 25, 2015, 10:11:32 PM by SMilo »

Jindal - he's wasted his entire governorship sucking up to SoCons. Perry is next most likely.

Gilmore, Bachmann could be before. Who even knows with Carson?

Santorum is cocky enough to stay in.
Logged
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,268
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 25, 2015, 05:48:00 PM »

Jim Gilmore is running?! Did he forget that nobody knew who the hell he was in 2008 and they still don't?
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,716
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 25, 2015, 06:32:20 PM »

Probably anyone placing 6th or lower, provided that they don't have a very strong infrastructure in NH/NV/SC. 4th/5th might drop out if their donor base was weak before the caucus. 1st/2nd/3rd are almost certain to stay in, with two exceptions: Huck will drop out if he gets anything less than 1st, Santorum will drop out if he gets anything less than 2nd.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,687
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 25, 2015, 06:58:54 PM »

Most of these will either not run or drop out before Iowa.  Rick Perry seems like he is the most likely to stay in until then and stake everything on Iowa and then have no success there.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 25, 2015, 07:27:39 PM »

I didn't know he was even considering running but definitely Jim Gilmore.

From the Tea Leaves thread:

Gilmore is also said to have a NH trip in the works later this month, and had this to say when asked about another presidential run:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/gilmore-raises-national-profile-wont-rule-out-presidential-bid/2014/12/29/081dadc0-8ac9-11e4-9e8d-0c687bc18da4_story.html?hpid=z3

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 25, 2015, 07:47:46 PM »
« Edited: January 25, 2015, 07:53:56 PM by Bull Moose Base »

Iowa is really hard to predict. I'm pretty sure that between Santorum, Romney, Paul, Gingrich, Perry, Bachmann and Cain, Santorum (the eventual winner) was the only one to never lead a statewide poll in Iowa. I'm too lazy to check but I also think Santorum was polling about even with Bachmann (who finished 6th and dropped out after Iowa) only a week or two before Caucus Day. We'll again have a lot of candidates with similar appeal (Cruz, Jindal, Perry, Walker, Carson, Huckabee, Santorum, Paul and if he runs, Pence) meaning an unexpected gaffe or story can sway voters in ways that are hard to predict a year, or even a month in advance. Nor do I think conservative vote-splitting will help the moderates much with many of Romney, Bush, Christie, Fiorina, Graham and Rubio likely to run. (Also, Romney couldn't even win it in 2012 when he was the lone moderate competing against multiple conservatives.) This is all a long way of saying don't believe anyone who tells you they have the slightest idea what will happen in Iowa other than a chaotic race, bloody free-for-all debates and hopefully a series of hilarious gaffes.
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,684
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 25, 2015, 07:49:52 PM »

Most likely Rick Perry.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 25, 2015, 07:56:23 PM »

I'm too lazy to check but I also think Santorum was polling about even with Bachmann (who finished 6th and dropped out after Iowa) only a week or two before Caucus Day.

Pretty much true, yes.  PPP poll of Iowa taken from Dec. 26th-27th:

https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/PRESIDENT/2012R/polls.php?action=indpoll&id=1920111227108

Paul 24%
Romney 20%
Gingrich 13%
Bachmann 11%
Perry 10%
Santorum 10%

Actual caucus result (Jan. 3rd):

Santorum 25%
Romney 25%
Paul 21%
Gingrich 13%
Perry 10%
Bachmann 5%
Logged
stegosaurus
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 628
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: 1.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 25, 2015, 10:11:53 PM »

Huckabee and Santorum are both completely screwed if they don't win Iowa.
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,863
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 25, 2015, 10:37:19 PM »

I do not think Walker, Santorum, Huckabee, Cruz, Palin Bachmann, Carson or Perry would have conceivable paths to the GOP nomination without winning in Iowa, and thus would be the most likely to drop-out soon after coming up short in the Hawkeye State. 
Logged
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: January 25, 2015, 11:24:19 PM »

Probably Carson.  He seems like a really down-to-earth guy but there's no way he becomes a serious candidate.  For some reason, a lot of my elderly relatives seem to like him though...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.052 seconds with 14 queries.