Which GOPer could skip Iowa?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 03:17:50 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Which GOPer could skip Iowa?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Which GOPer could skip Iowa?  (Read 1290 times)
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 31, 2015, 09:01:18 PM »

In the past some candidates on both sides have skipped Iowa, but went on to win the nomination, like John McCain in 08. So this year could any of the major GOP candidates skip Iowa, and if so, who?
Logged
Brewer
BrewerPaul
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,622


Political Matrix
E: -6.90, S: -6.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2015, 09:30:02 PM »

Chris Christie and possibly Jeb Bush.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 31, 2015, 09:32:16 PM »

Chris Christie and possibly Jeb Bush.

This, but I doubt either one will.
Logged
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,269
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 31, 2015, 09:34:25 PM »

They all ought to skip it after the mess Iowa made of things last year. They couldn't even get the winner correct until months later.

The national party ought to issue an ultimatum to them telling them to either switch to a standard primary or lose their "first in the nation" privilege.
Logged
Cory
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,708


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 31, 2015, 09:44:28 PM »

Chris Christie and possibly Jeb Bush.

This, but I doubt either one will.
Logged
BaconBacon96
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,678
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 31, 2015, 10:17:49 PM »

Chris Christie and possibly Jeb Bush.

I could see one or both of them doing it. It would clear up resources and allow them to focus on the more likely win.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,694
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 31, 2015, 10:24:56 PM »

They all ought to skip it after the mess Iowa made of things last year. They couldn't even get the winner correct until months later.

The national party ought to issue an ultimatum to them telling them to either switch to a standard primary or lose their "first in the nation" privilege.
It was 3 weeks, not months. Get your facts straight.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 31, 2015, 10:47:12 PM »

They all ought to skip it after the mess Iowa made of things last year. They couldn't even get the winner correct until months later.

Last year?
Logged
ShadowRocket
cb48026
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,461


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 31, 2015, 11:17:05 PM »

Chris Christie and possibly Jeb Bush.

Agreed. NH is do-or-die for Christie so I expect him to eventually pull a page out of McCain's 2008 playbook and focus exclusively on there.

I think Jeb will make a play in the hopes that victory in Iowa can help him lock down the nomination quickly. 
Logged
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,269
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 01, 2015, 04:35:34 PM »

They all ought to skip it after the mess Iowa made of things last year. They couldn't even get the winner correct until months later.

The national party ought to issue an ultimatum to them telling them to either switch to a standard primary or lose their "first in the nation" privilege.
It was 3 weeks, not months. Get your facts straight.

They all ought to skip it after the mess Iowa made of things last year. They couldn't even get the winner correct until months later.

Last year?


By this of course I mean last time.

However long it was, it was totally unacceptable. I'm no fan of Rick Santorum but I'd argue he was unfairly robbed of the momentum he would have gotten had his win in Iowa been known when it was supposed to.
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,846
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 01, 2015, 04:51:58 PM »

When was the last time Iowa even mattered in a Republican nominating contest?

South Carolina is the kingmaker. 
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 01, 2015, 06:02:26 PM »


Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 01, 2015, 06:40:45 PM »

Jeb Bush has a serious problem in that he doesn't seem able to win any early primary states until Florida, and Giuliani has already demonstrated that this is too late. Paul, who seems to be close-but-not-quite-there in both IA and NH, and strong in the west in spite of not being from there, looks a lot like Romney 2008.
Logged
heatmaster
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,244
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 02, 2015, 12:46:31 PM »

None of them should, bull all of them will...another example of pandering!
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,684
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 02, 2015, 12:56:36 PM »

Chris Christie, I suppose.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 02, 2015, 01:13:53 PM »

Winning Iowa is not important at all. In fact, NH is far more important. But in order to win NH, you have to stay relevant enough in the news from Iowa. Huntsman and Giuliani were written off as jokes by completely skipping out on IA and could not recover.

McCain would not have won New Hampshire if he hadn't finished in the Top 4 with 13% of the vote in Iowa. The Top 4 finishers are what newspapers and TV outlets publish on the headline and then the rest are listed in fine print. It let New Hampshire-ites know he was still seriously in the race and an alternative to Romney.
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,531
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 02, 2015, 02:55:24 PM »

Christie
Logged
heatmaster
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,244
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: February 02, 2015, 03:00:24 PM »

Still be better just to break the mold and ignore Iowa, but very candidates have the will or courage to do so, accordingly that's the reason why both parties are held hostage to the extreme elements in the delegate selection processes. Once Iowa became the Kingmaker in the nominating process, extremism won out.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.05 seconds with 14 queries.