When do you plan on endorsing Hillary Clinton for President?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 03:44:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  When do you plan on endorsing Hillary Clinton for President?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
Poll
Question: When do you plan on endorsing Hillary Clinton for President?
#1
I have already endorsed Hillary
 
#2
Before July 4, 2015
 
#3
After July 4, 2015 but before the 1st GOP debate in August
 
#4
Before the Iowa Caucuses
 
#5
Before the New Hampshire Primary
 
#6
Before the DNC
 
#7
After the 1st Presidential Debate
 
#8
After the 2nd Presidential Debate
 
#9
After the 3rd Presidential Debate
 
#10
Election Day
 
#11
I will begrudgingly acknowledge her Presidency after the election
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 40

Author Topic: When do you plan on endorsing Hillary Clinton for President?  (Read 8321 times)
Oak Hills
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,076
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: February 04, 2015, 09:46:12 PM »

I will probably endorse Bernie in the primaries, and whomever the Greens run in the general.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,173
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: February 04, 2015, 10:46:11 PM »

Before the DNC, should she be nominated and not lose to a member of the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party in the primaries.

Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,297
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: February 04, 2015, 11:18:37 PM »

Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: February 04, 2015, 11:41:20 PM »

If she wins the nomination, I'll probably vote for her.  I might go third party, though (but that was always an option anyways).
Logged
RR1997
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,997
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: February 04, 2015, 11:42:36 PM »
« Edited: February 04, 2015, 11:45:59 PM by RR1997 »

It depends on who the GOP frontrunner is.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,737


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: February 04, 2015, 11:48:47 PM »

I will never "endorse" her. I will vote for her...very begrudgingly.
Logged
The Dowager Mod
texasgurl
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,974
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.48, S: -8.57

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: February 05, 2015, 12:08:39 AM »

8 years ago.
Logged
MATTROSE94
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,803
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -6.43

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: February 05, 2015, 11:24:20 AM »

It depends on who the GOP frontrunner is.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: February 05, 2015, 11:30:31 AM »

I just realized I forgot to include an option for people planning to endorse Hillary between the DNC adn the 1st Presidential Debate. My apologies.
Logged
DemPGH
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,755
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: February 05, 2015, 12:21:26 PM »

For me, reality dictates that I'll begin supporting her sometime between when she announces and I am completely confident that anyone else would be too risky. So, probably right after she announces.
Logged
traininthedistance
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: February 05, 2015, 12:27:59 PM »

When she clinches the nomination.  Earlier if the sacrificial lambs running against her are more Randall Terry than Bill Bradley.
Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,830
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: February 05, 2015, 12:46:14 PM »

#ready4hillary
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: February 05, 2015, 03:10:50 PM »

Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: February 05, 2015, 03:11:52 PM »

It's so cute that some of you think she'll win the Presidency.

Hilldawg’s strength is overrated, but honestly who’s going to beat her.  Scott Walker?  Adorable Tongue

Who'll beat her? Some no name freshman senator? Adorable Tongue
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: February 06, 2015, 12:06:17 AM »

It's so cute that some of you think she'll win the Presidency.

Hilldawg’s strength is overrated, but honestly who’s going to beat her.  Scott Walker?  Adorable Tongue

Who'll beat her? Some no name freshman senator? Adorable Tongue

I think you mean the guy who gave the 2004 DNC keynote address and was widely speculated as a future presidential contender from that moment on. The myth that Obama was a nobody who emerged out of obscurity is quite pervasive it seems.
Logged
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,232
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: February 07, 2015, 10:39:07 AM »

I already have. If she runs, she will have my vote in both the primary and the general election.
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: February 07, 2015, 12:23:16 PM »

It's so cute that some of you think she'll win the Presidency.

Hilldawg’s strength is overrated, but honestly who’s going to beat her.  Scott Walker?  Adorable Tongue

Who'll beat her? Some no name freshman senator? Adorable Tongue

I think you mean the guy who gave the 2004 DNC keynote address and was widely speculated as a future presidential contender from that moment on. The myth that Obama was a nobody who emerged out of obscurity is quite pervasive it seems.

BUT. Everyone, even with Obama in, expected Shillary to be the nominee in 2008.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: February 07, 2015, 12:25:01 PM »

Probably never.

If she has a decent lead a few days before the election, I'd even vote for Jill Stein (Green Party).
Logged
Negusa Nagast 🚀
Nagas
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,826
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: February 07, 2015, 12:38:06 PM »

It's so cute that some of you think she'll win the Presidency.

Hilldawg’s strength is overrated, but honestly who’s going to beat her.  Scott Walker?  Adorable Tongue

Who'll beat her? Some no name freshman senator? Adorable Tongue

I think you mean the guy who gave the 2004 DNC keynote address and was widely speculated as a future presidential contender from that moment on. The myth that Obama was a nobody who emerged out of obscurity is quite pervasive it seems.

BUT. Everyone, even with Obama in, expected Shillary to be the nominee in 2008.

Can you explain this little portmanteau to me Hawk? It looks like you're combining "shrill" and "Hillary," the former historically being a sexist pejorative used against women.

On your actual point: Hillary was never 100% expected to be the nominee in 2008. For most of 2007, Obama was outraising her and iirc she never went above 50% on Intrade.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,923


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: February 07, 2015, 01:07:13 PM »

Yeah I have no idea where this "Clinton was inevitable in 2008 story line" is coming from. Like Nagas said, Obama frequently out-raised her. She was generally doing no better than tied in Iowa (with Edwards) and New Hampshire (with Obama). A lot of people thought that once the anti-Clinton voted consolidated after Edwards or Obama dropped out, the remaining one would defeat Clinton.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: February 07, 2015, 01:42:18 PM »

Yeah I have no idea where this "Clinton was inevitable in 2008 story line" is coming from. Like Nagas said, Obama frequently out-raised her. She was generally doing no better than tied in Iowa (with Edwards) and New Hampshire (with Obama). A lot of people thought that once the anti-Clinton voted consolidated after Edwards or Obama dropped out, the remaining one would defeat Clinton.

It's a retrospective narrative conjured up by the media based off no empirical evidence. It's not hard to see why. "David beats Goliath" sounds a lot more interesting than "Guy in strong second place defeats frontrunner."
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: February 07, 2015, 01:45:32 PM »

Yeah I have no idea where this "Clinton was inevitable in 2008 story line" is coming from. Like Nagas said, Obama frequently out-raised her. She was generally doing no better than tied in Iowa (with Edwards) and New Hampshire (with Obama). A lot of people thought that once the anti-Clinton voted consolidated after Edwards or Obama dropped out, the remaining one would defeat Clinton.

And in 2006, most of the threads on here had everyone believing Mark Warner or Evan Bayh would be the nominee.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,073
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: February 07, 2015, 01:46:07 PM »

Who, on 02/07/2007, seriously thought Obama was going to win?
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,923


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: February 07, 2015, 01:51:59 PM »

Who, on 02/07/2007, seriously thought Obama was going to win?

The proper question is who, on 2/07/2007, seriously thought Clinton was going to lose. And many, many people did.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: February 07, 2015, 02:09:29 PM »

Who, on 02/07/2007, seriously thought Obama was going to win?

Here's the betting markets following Obama's declaration:

Obama near record high.

DOWN: Clinton, Dodd
UP: Obama, Edwards

Democrats
Clinton 48.6
Obama 21.5
Edwards 13.5
Gore 9.6
Richardson 2.6
Biden 1.1
Vilsack 1.0
Clark 0.8
Warner 0.6
Dodd 0.2

Another myth that needs to die: "NOBODY gave the junior Senator from Illinois even a 1% chance!!11!!!!1!!1!!"
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.067 seconds with 14 queries.