Governor Terrible (Brownback) to balance budget via cutting highway funding (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 04:17:46 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Governor Terrible (Brownback) to balance budget via cutting highway funding (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Governor Terrible (Brownback) to balance budget via cutting highway funding  (Read 6326 times)
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


« on: February 08, 2015, 04:13:28 PM »

Excellent news!

Ibn Rushd, take my daily commute to work and then tell me how "overbuilt" you think American highways are. The Texas DoT is finally building an interchange that should have been done years ago that will reduce my commute time by a good 10-15%.

For rural areas, highways are their only lifeline to the outside world.

Ever heard of "induced demand"? Take the train.

You really are an idiot, aren't you? There is a whole world outside the Bos-Wash corridor, Simfan. There are none of these "trains" of which you speak in Houston or any other city in these part of the country.

Besides, it's freaking Kansas. Large swathes of this money is going to finance infrastructure where population density is extremely low.  It hardly makes sense for people from such places to "take the train".
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2015, 07:03:14 PM »

A question for the pro-train crowd:
Given development for the past 50+ years, large swaths of American cities aren't dense. This makes light rail and the like more expensive since you have X people living within a short distance of a train station rather than 3X (a rough comparison of Houston and Berlin's densities)

With that in mind, how would you propose creating a mass transit system without bankrupting cash strapped states and municipalities?

The best I can come up with is making heavy use of existing infrastructure by encouraging commuter friendly buses and so on.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2015, 07:42:30 PM »

A question for the pro-train crowd:
Given development for the past 50+ years, large swaths of American cities aren't dense. This makes light rail and the like more expensive since you have X people living within a short distance of a train station rather than 3X (a rough comparison of Houston and Berlin's densities)

With that in mind, how would you propose creating a mass transit system without bankrupting cash strapped states and municipalities?

The best I can come up with is making heavy use of existing infrastructure by encouraging commuter friendly buses and so on.

How would I want to pay for transit development?  Double or triple the gas tax, vehicle registration taxes, carbon tax, income taxes and bold Federal spending on infrastructure.  I would also pair that with fast track authority to skip EIR and other red tape to cut down costs. 

The interstate highway system cost a half trillion dollars.  Why not try a program like that which focused on sustainable mass transit and infrastructure?

I don't disagree with you, but you are missing my point.

I'm asking how you would implement a mass transit system given the current legislative climate.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2015, 08:11:25 PM »

Also, "buses are for poor people" is bullsh*t.  Buses can, and should, be for everyone.  (And there are already apps which help with the problem you mention, which I agree is a real one.)

I take the bus. About half the time I work standard hours and get to take an express bus. It's only 5 minutes longer than driving and cheaper too. The other half, I work odd hours and take a normal bus. It takes me a full 30 minutes longer to get home and has a higher proportion of "problem passengers". I imagine your typical bus in a mid-sized American city is like my "normal bus" rather than my "express bus".

If I had to take the normal bus all the time, I'd drive... and I'm someone with a relatively low income and a somewhat progressive attitude to transportation. What's your average Joe going to do when faced with the same situation?

Part of the challenge for cities will be to make the bus more appealing to middle class commuters.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.